[Internal-cg] U.S. Government Funding Bill & ANA Transition

[James M. Bladel]

There was also a good analysis from Kieren McCarthy in The Register. 

My take is that this move would primarily close the "checkbook" for NTIA for transition-related activities. But I am not clear on what this means in practical terms for them. 

For us, I agree that we proceed with our current momentum. 

Thanks. 

J. 

Sent via iPhone. Blame Siri. 


> On Dec 11, 2014, at 08:34, Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> There was a post by Phil Corwin on circle ID providing some more info... I'm not in a position to forward now...
> 
> Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: Jari Arkko [jari.arkko at piuha.net]
> Received: Thursday, 11 Dec 2014, 3:51PM
> To: Adiel Akplogan [adiel at afrinic.net]
> CC: ICG [internal-cg at icann.org]
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] U.S. Government Funding Bill & ANA Transition
> 
> I certainly do not have any inside information.
> 
> My opinion, however, is that it probably serves us well to be calm and not too affected by political debates. It is important that we get the transition right, and we will. Lets continue. Events like this are only underlining the need for the transition.
> 
> Jari
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg