[Internal-cg] Rép: Re: Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Tue Jul 15 19:25:51 UTC 2014
On 15.07.14 21:01 , WUKnoben wrote:
> All,
>
> having initiated the group naming debate I've put together a short list
> of suggestions, see attached.
>
> We should be able to finalize this in London.
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
Wolf-Ulrich,
OK I have resisted this far to add anything more to this discussion; but
an excel spreadsheet makes it just too official. I hereby formally state
that ICOBS was a *joke*. Apparently my reference to "Sunday afternoon
humour" was not explicit enough.
If you insist on a serious contribution from me, make it
ICBG: IANA Consensus Building Group.
In the long Internet governance tradition of four letter acronyms this
one has not been used for anything prominent according to both my own
memory and the search engines. The only real prominent use I could find
has to do with biodiversity. This strikes me as a good pun considering
the composition of our group.
Now that my entry is in the hat, may I suggest that we focus on content
and choose our name by lucky draw? <--- quite serious remark
Bis die Tage
Daniel
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list