[Internal-cg] Early draft for a charter

[James M. Bladel]

The GNSO wrestles with this issue (consensus levels) in its policy development process. We have developed some descriptions/guidelines that differentiate between "unanimous" vs "consensus" vs "strong support, with opposition".

Perhaps on of the Staff folks could post these to the list for the group's consideration?

Thank you--

J.
__________________________
James Bladel
GoDaddy
jbladel at godaddy.com



> On Jul 16, 2014, at 13:30, "Daniel Karrenberg" <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 15.07.14 20:53 , WUKnoben wrote:
>> I think the group has to be clear about the various consensus levels
>> everybody has in mind when talking about "consensus". In addition it
>> should be transparent on whose behalf CG members speak and - if at all -
>> participate in consensus calls. It could be helpful to mention it in the
>> charter.
> 
> This is a hard problem in general. In our specific case I would go for
> the pragmatic approach: "No outspoken disagreement by anyone NTIA cannot
> ignore." This is easy to check if we liaise closely with NTIA.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg