[Internal-cg] Input on the Question of the Secretariat
Lynn St.Amour
Lynn at lstamour.org
Thu Jul 17 17:00:59 UTC 2014
Some vacation Patrik :-)
And would you see the same requirement as below for external contacts and digestibility of actions or emerging directions for broad public consumption?
Lynn
On Jul 17, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
> I would add some more issues related to content, as there will be A LOT of text floating around, and we can not rely on us volunteers to read and write every single character:
>
> - Operate and managed contact points for the community
> - Compile and summarize input from the community, so that it is easily digestible by CG members (so we can dive into details where needed)
> - Copy editing of documents, output and whatever else CG need help with
>
> paf
>
> On 17 jul 2014, at 18:19, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
>
>> I do not think that a long RFP process is needed, but that is a separate topic.
>>
>> I think we will need secretariat support for:
>> - minutes
>> - action item tracking
>> - calendar for meeting and teleconference schedules
>> - mail list management
>> - web pages
>> -- facilitate meeting information distribution
>> -- information dissemination to the public
>> -- wiki pages (or other technology) that allows us to each make edits to content
>> -- posting draft document
>> -- posting meeting minutes, transcripts, audio streams, and so on
>> -- coordinate with ICANN staff on meeting arrangements and media interactions
>>
>> I have assumed that ICANN staff will continue to handle the meeting venue arrangements and travel arrangements.
>>
>> Russ
>>
>>
>> On Jul 17, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>>
>>> I have been voluntold to lead a discussion on the secretariat. In the
>>> interest of making this effective can those who have strong positions on
>>> this to speak/mail to me before start of proceedings tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Frankly I was surprised at the amount of "complications" such as RFPs in
>>> this. I am taking no position on this, just expressing surprise and a
>>> willingness to understand the issues.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list