[Internal-cg] Co-chair roles document for comment

Alissa Cooper alissa at cooperw.in
Tue Jul 22 15:59:55 UTC 2014


Hi all,

Thanks to Mary for the good suggestion and to others for the
demonstrations of support. I think the chair plus alternate chair approach
sounds good. I am willing to be the chair if the group so chooses.

Best,
Alissa 

On 7/21/14, 11:22 PM, "Wu Kuo-Wei" <kuoweiwu at gmail.com> wrote:

>Yes, I also support Alissa as the Chair.
>
>Kuo Wu
>
>Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com> 於 2014/7/22 0:33 寫道:
>
>> One possibility would be to use an arrangement that the Registries
>>Stakeholder Group relies upon....a Chair and "Alternate Chair" who steps
>>in to run meetings when the Chair is unavailable and who helps support
>>the Chair with managing group business. That leaves one person clearly
>>in the leadership/management role and also provides a backup resource
>>without splitting the duties and creating a political challenge.
>> 
>> For the record, I also support Alissa as Chair if she's available.
>> 
>> Thanks, 
>> Keith
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
>>[mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
>> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 12:24 PM
>> To: internal-cg at icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Co-chair roles document for comment
>> 
>> I hear both Mary and Daniel, but still support the idea of two or three
>>co-chairs. While I'd be very happy with Alissa as our chair, for reasons
>>of distributing work load and of political balance, I'd like to add
>>another one or two. Either way, this is not a killer issue for me. I
>>just want to get it resolved soon so we can get moving.
>> 
>> --MM
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
>>[mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Karrenberg
>> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 6:08 AM
>> To: Mary Uduma; internal-cg at icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Co-chair roles document for comment
>> 
>> On 21.07.14 0:45 , Mary Uduma wrote:
>>> ...
>>> In my opinion,  I would ask the ICG to rethink on the  issue of
>>> co-chairs.  I think we need only a Chairperson to fast-rack our work.
>>> It is always very challenging to row the  boat smoothly when there are
>>> several captains. Moreover, ICG is not a permanent Group.
>>> 
>>> We should cut down on bureaucracies of selecting three co-chairs with
>>> all the attendant "balancing"  that must be considered in the process.
>>> 
>>> Looking back at 17-18 July meeting, you will agree with me that it was
>>> smooth, focused and well steered.
>>> 
>>> I will urge us to select a capable chair who can always call for
>>> volunteer leads on  theme(s) and other adhoc task(s}.
>>> ...
>> 
>> I think Mary has spoken very wise words here. It is a pity that we have
>>been too far down a rat-hole to hear her when she said this during the
>>meeting. Maybe we can take the chance to heed her advice now.
>> 
>> I, for one, completely agree with her.
>> 
>> I also believe Alissa did an outstanding job preparing and running the
>>meeting. We should we look further?
>> 
>> Daniel
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>_______________________________________________
>Internal-cg mailing list
>Internal-cg at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg





More information about the Internal-cg mailing list