[Internal-cg] Handling Comments submitted to CG - Re: Fwd: Comments on Draft charter for the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group

[Mohamed El Bashir]

Dear All,

As our CG Charter is currently up for comments, then there should be a
proper comments process with designated channel/s for people to contribute.

Richard Hill submitted comments on the charter and because his is not a
member of the internal-CG mailing list, his contribution forwarded by ICANN
staff and therefore accepted as valid contribution and further discussions
evolved .

i am concerned that we don't a clear process for receiving/handling
comments neither from the wider stakeholders community or our 13
represented communities within CG.

The Comment period deadlines need to be clear, e.g the draft charter
document nor CG web page dose provide any information about how and when to
submit comments.

suggesting the following :

- internal-CG mailing list to used for internal CG members discussion only,
lets avoid copying internal CG mailing list in the communities internal
IANA transition mailing lists discussion. we are presenting our communities
in CG and cross mailing lists emails will create confusion.

- secretariat to create a specific email/mailing list for comments
submission to CG ( e.g cg-comments at xxxx ), the submitted contributions can
be available online as well.

-  Comments from represented communities should be sent only via their
representatives in CG.

- the submitted comments can be reviewed at the end of the comment period
or as its been received ( our internal decision), its always better to
produce the updated draft document incorporating the accepted comments
after reviewing all the submitted comments, the final document to be
reviewed and approved by CG .

BTW, our last meeting documents (e.g charter, statement,.. ) is published
in ICANN web site under "announcements",  it need to be added to our CG web
pages under "IANA Stewardship" for easy access for everyone.

Regards,
Mohamed

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj at icann.org> wrote:

>  Dear all,
>
>  Richard Hill has submitted comments on the draft charter (attached).
>
>  Given that he does not have posting rights to this mailing list, we are
> forwarding his original note to ensure delivery.
>
>  Best,
> Ergys
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>  *From:* Richard Hill <rhill at hill-a.ch>
> *Date:* July 23, 2014 at 12:30:01 PM GMT+2
> *To:* "Ianaxfer at Elists. Isoc. Org" <ianaxfer at elists.isoc.org>,
> "Ianatransition at Icann. Org" <ianatransition at icann.org>, ICANN Internal <
> internal-cg at icann.org>
> *Cc:* "Rhill at Alum. Mit. Edu" <rhill at alum.mit.edu>
> *Subject:* *[Internal-cg] Comments on Draft charter for the IANA
> Stewardship Transition Coordination Group*
> *Reply-To:* <rhill at hill-a.ch>
>
>   Please find attached my comments on the Draft charter for the IANA
> Stewardship Transition Coordination Group and some proposed revisions.
>
> Best,
> Richard Hill
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140724/16334ffb/attachment.html>