[Internal-cg] Participation in ICG - 6 points to reach consensus on

[Patrik Fältström]

Thanks Mary,

   Patrik

On 31 jul 2014, at 02:33, Mary Uduma <mnuduma at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I did not see the original message from Patrik due to limited connections at my location.
> 
> I do support the 5 points raised, and on the 6th, I support option D as it seems the most 
> practical alternative taking into account Joe's suggestions as well.
> 
> Mary Uduma
> 
> On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 1:36 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
> 
> 
> Alissa,
> 
> My summary of the feedback is as follows.
> 
> I created the proposal and because of that of course stand behind all suggestions.
> 
> In addition, I have seen feedback from:
> 
> Adiel Akplogan
> Joseph Alhadeff
> Lynn St.Amour
> Manal Ismail
> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
> Milton Müller
> Jon Nevett
> Jean-Jacques Subrenat
> Paul Wilson
> 
> I.e. 10 people I know the view of.
> 
> Everyone of those commenting agree with the following 6 suggestions for the first 5 issues:
> 
> > 1. Members and liaisons to ICG
> > 
> > Suggestion: When consensus is to be reached, consensus is only among
> > members (not members+liaisons).
> > 
> > 2. Support staff
> > 
> > Suggestion: We accept the proposal from ICANN to until further notice
> > from ICG continue with this set of support staff: Theresa, Ergys,
> > Alice, Jim and Hillary.
> > 
> > 3. Interim appointed GAC member
> > 
> > Suggestion: The IGC thank Tracy for the ability to participate.
> > 
> > 4. Minutes of our meeting
> > 
> > Suggestion: We postpone discussion on minutes and otherwise record
> > taking of our future meetings to the discussion on the Secretariat.
> > 
> > Suggestion: Until minutes from first meeting are complete, Sam
> > Dickingson should be treated as support staff (together with Theresa,
> > Ergys, Alice, Jim and Hillary).
> > 
> > 5. ICANN backup contacts
> > 
> > Suggestion: We support ICANN in this proposal, thanks Jamie and Grace
> > for their ability to help, and I validate the situation that they have
> > been removed from the mailing list and that way got special treatment
> > compared with other ICANN staff.
> 
> For the last issue, regarding "write access" to our documents the feedback is split.
> 
> First a reminder what I wrote:
> 
> > 6. Write access to our documents
> > 
> > Everyone is to be given read access to our documents. Question is who
> > should get read/write access.
> > 
> > We have a number of alternatives here, and which one we choose depends
> > on what answers we get on the questions above.
> > 
> > Alternative A: Members only
> > 
> > Today members of ICG do have write access, and update of documents
> > there depends on members doing explicit actions.
> > 
> > Alternative B: Members + liaisons
> > 
> > To make feedback loop from liaisons easier, we also give write access
> > for liaisons. This do give ability for liaisons to write in documents,
> > which might be preferable for example in the form of change tags in
> > Word documents.
> > 
> > Alternative C: Members + Support Staff
> > 
> > By letting support staff write to documents members will be relieved
> > from the task of updating documents and otherwise do purely
> > administerial tasks.
> > 
> > Alternative D: Members + Liaisons + Support Staff
> > 
> > A merge of alternative B and C. In reality it implies (given my
> > suggestion on issue 5 above finds consensus in ICG) that all members of
> > this mailing list do get read/write access to the documents.
> > 
> > Suggestion: Alternative D, i.e. all Members, Liaisons and Support
> > Staff get read/write access to our documents.
> 
> Out of the individuals I have heard from, I have the following feedback, in order depending on how supportive the individuals are of D and other alternatives:
> 
> D, with additional information that in practice it is the only workable alternative:
> 
> Patrik Fältström
> Paul Wilson
> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
> Lynn St.Amour
> 
> D, without any details:
> 
> Jon Nevett
> Manal Ismail
> Jean-Jacques Subrenat
> 
> D, with the constraint that it must be possible to trace who made what change:
> 
> Joseph Alhadeff
> 
> Prefer C, but can live with D:
> 
> 
> Adiel Akplogan
> 
> 
> Against D, and instead prefer A:
> 
> Milton Müller
> 
> 
> I hope this helps.
> 
>     Regards, Patrik
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140731/abb5becc/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140731/abb5becc/signature.asc>