[Internal-cg] ICG FAQ ..

[Patrik Fältström]

On 1 okt 2014, at 06:23, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:

> Personally, I do not think we need to add definitions. It adds to the confusion.

My apologies for not being more clear...

Reason for this is that we already have an agreed to text in the RFP we have submitted.

As Milton said on the call, we should have simple answers to simple repeated questions.

Regarding "what is IANA", maybe we should just remove the question?

   Patrik

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20141001/2a89fa60/signature.asc>