[Internal-cg] FAQ - deadline for comments

Manal Ismail manal at tra.gov.eg
Mon Oct 6 21:16:16 UTC 2014

Thanks Alissa ..

Dear All ..

Please find attached, and in Dropbox, version 3, clean and in track
changes ..
In the clean version, I have:
- accepted edits by Narelle, all extremely helpful, which I believe have
also addressed some of the comments received
- deleted comments I felt have been addressed
- deleted questions 8 & 9, for the time being, following the below
- modified question 7 to read "Does IANA carry out functions other than
names, number & protocol identifiers?" and would appreciate help in
listing IANA functions not under NTIA contact
- in addition to Q7, I believe there are unaddressed comments on Q12 &

Looking forward to receiving your comments by 23:59 UTC on October 7 .. 

Kind Regards

-----Original Message-----
From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in] 
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 6:52 PM
To: Manal Ismail
Cc: Narelle Clark; Kavouss Arasteh; Milton L Mueller; ICG
Subject: FAQ - deadline for comments


So that we can get a draft, living version of the FAQ posted to the web
site prior to ICANN 51, we need to give Manal a little time to compile
outstanding comments and create a clean version. Comments sent to the
list about the FAQ prior to 23:59 UTC on October 7 will be incorporated
into the initial version we publish on the web. Of course we will
continue discussion and refinement of the FAQ after that, but if you
want your edits incorporated into the initial version that we publish,
please send them in before the deadline.


On Oct 5, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:

> Thanks for the responses ..
> I believe we have agreed to have a version out before LA, right?
> If yes, then maybe we should set a cutoff date for comments, after
which we should compile an agreed version to be posted online, and
continue discussing any remaining 'relevant' questions .. 
> Views received so far, which I personally share and Narelle showed
flexibility, are in favour of deleting Q9 .. 
> As for Q7, I personally agree to deleting it, but allow me to propose
a middle ground .. It may be changed to read "Does IANA carry out
functions other than names, number & protocol identifiers?", although
the answer may be the same, it  would be stating facts rather than
predicting outcome of the process .. thoughts?
> Q8 is one of the questions that were listed for the session held at
the IGF, but I agree to its deletion .. 
> Waiting for further comments before compiling a new version ..
> Kind Regards
> --Manal
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Narelle Clark
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 2:56 AM
> To: Kavouss Arasteh; Milton L Mueller
> Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ ..
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 3 October 2014 5:01 AM
>> I agree with Milton in regard with IANA INVOKING POWER .However, I 
>> would like to know whether the replacement of NTIA ,if any, would 
>> have the same or would excercise the same power?
> Like I said, I am not wed to the inclusion of the question re
invocation of power. As they say, I was merely flying a kite as it is a
question I have been frequently receiving.
> To the latter question, that surely is up to the communities to
propose and decide.
> And a good question, indeed.
>> In regard with his second comment, I am not sure that we should limit

>> ourselcves to say  about who were are; what we do; how to respond to 
>> our RFP; the respective roles of the ICG, operational communities, 
>> USG; how people can get involved in any of those activities.
>> I do not see any problem if we could provide information on IANA, the

>> IANA transition, and ICANN accountability
> I agree they are questions people need and want answers to. Whether we
should be the ones to provide them is subject to how much time we have
as it can be a long diversion...
> The risk is that it dilutes our credibility as impartial coordinators
of the community finding its own answers.
> Best regards
> Narelle
> --
> Narelle Clark
> Director of Operations - Deputy CEO
> Australian Communications
> Consumer Action Network
> Suite 4.02 Level 4
> 55 Mountain St
> Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia
> Follow us on twitter @ACCAN_AU
> Sign up for our weekly WebNews
> Visit our website
> ---------------------------------------------
> The information contained in or attached to this message is intended
only for the people it is addressed to. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this information is
unauthorised and prohibited. This information may be confidential or
subject to legal privilege. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and any attachments.
The Australian Communications Consumer Action Network does not warrant
that the information in this e-mail or any attachments are free from any
viruses, defects, errors, interception or interference.
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ICG-FAQ-v3 - clean.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 77312 bytes
Desc: ICG-FAQ-v3 - clean.doc
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20141006/6f7f31e7/ICG-FAQ-v3-clean.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ICG-FAQ-v3.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 100864 bytes
Desc: ICG-FAQ-v3.doc
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20141006/6f7f31e7/ICG-FAQ-v3.doc>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list