[Internal-cg] FAQ - deadline for comments

Manal Ismail manal at tra.gov.eg
Mon Oct 6 22:18:52 UTC 2014


Thanks Milton ..
I have noted the below addition and your suggestion to delete Q#7 ..
Kind Regards
--Manal

-----Original Message-----
From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 12:10 AM
To: Manal Ismail; Alissa Cooper
Cc: Narelle Clark; Kavouss Arasteh; ICG
Subject: RE: FAQ - deadline for comments

Add to question 15, after the 1st sentence: Our goal is for the
operational community proposals to be received by January 15, 2015, and
for the transition to be complete by September 30, 2015.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manal Ismail [mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg]
> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 5:16 PM
> To: Alissa Cooper
> Cc: Narelle Clark; Kavouss Arasteh; Milton L Mueller; ICG
> Subject: RE: FAQ - deadline for comments
> 
> Thanks Alissa ..
> 
> Dear All ..
> 
> Please find attached, and in Dropbox, version 3, clean and in track
changes ..
> In the clean version, I have:
> - accepted edits by Narelle, all extremely helpful, which I believe 
> have also addressed some of the comments received
> - deleted comments I felt have been addressed
> - deleted questions 8 & 9, for the time being, following the below 
> exchange
> - modified question 7 to read "Does IANA carry out functions other 
> than names, number & protocol identifiers?" and would appreciate help 
> in listing IANA functions not under NTIA contact
> - in addition to Q7, I believe there are unaddressed comments on Q12 &
> Q18
> 
> Looking forward to receiving your comments by 23:59 UTC on October 7
..
> 
> Kind Regards
> --Manal
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in]
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 6:52 PM
> To: Manal Ismail
> Cc: Narelle Clark; Kavouss Arasteh; Milton L Mueller; ICG
> Subject: FAQ - deadline for comments
> 
> All,
> 
> So that we can get a draft, living version of the FAQ posted to the 
> web site prior to ICANN 51, we need to give Manal a little time to 
> compile outstanding comments and create a clean version. Comments sent

> to the list about the FAQ prior to 23:59 UTC on October 7 will be 
> incorporated into the initial version we publish on the web. Of course

> we will continue discussion and refinement of the FAQ after that, but 
> if you want your edits incorporated into the initial version that we
publish, please send them in before the deadline.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alissa
> 
> On Oct 5, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the responses ..
> > I believe we have agreed to have a version out before LA, right?
> > If yes, then maybe we should set a cutoff date for comments, after
> which we should compile an agreed version to be posted online, and 
> continue discussing any remaining 'relevant' questions ..
> >
> > Views received so far, which I personally share and Narelle showed
> flexibility, are in favour of deleting Q9 ..
> >
> > As for Q7, I personally agree to deleting it, but allow me to 
> > propose
> a middle ground .. It may be changed to read "Does IANA carry out 
> functions other than names, number & protocol identifiers?", although 
> the answer may be the same, it  would be stating facts rather than 
> predicting outcome of the process .. thoughts?
> >
> > Q8 is one of the questions that were listed for the session held at
> the IGF, but I agree to its deletion ..
> >
> > Waiting for further comments before compiling a new version ..
> >
> > Kind Regards
> > --Manal
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
> > [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Narelle Clark
> > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 2:56 AM
> > To: Kavouss Arasteh; Milton L Mueller
> > Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
> > Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ ..
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, 3 October 2014 5:01 AM
> >>
> >> I agree with Milton in regard with IANA INVOKING POWER .However, I 
> >> would like to know whether the replacement of NTIA ,if any, would 
> >> have the same or would excercise the same power?
> >
> > Like I said, I am not wed to the inclusion of the question re
> invocation of power. As they say, I was merely flying a kite as it is 
> a question I have been frequently receiving.
> >
> > To the latter question, that surely is up to the communities to
> propose and decide.
> >
> > And a good question, indeed.
> >
> >> In regard with his second comment, I am not sure that we should 
> >> limit
> 
> >> ourselcves to say  about who were are; what we do; how to respond 
> >> to our RFP; the respective roles of the ICG, operational 
> >> communities, USG; how people can get involved in any of those
activities.
> >> I do not see any problem if we could provide information on IANA, 
> >> the
> 
> >> IANA transition, and ICANN accountability
> >
> > I agree they are questions people need and want answers to. Whether 
> > we
> should be the ones to provide them is subject to how much time we have

> as it can be a long diversion...
> >
> > The risk is that it dilutes our credibility as impartial 
> > coordinators
> of the community finding its own answers.
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> >
> > Narelle
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Narelle Clark
> > Director of Operations - Deputy CEO
> > Australian Communications
> > Consumer Action Network
> >
> > Suite 4.02 Level 4
> > 55 Mountain St
> > Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia
> >
> > Follow us on twitter @ACCAN_AU
> > Sign up for our weekly WebNews
> > Visit our website
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> >
> > The information contained in or attached to this message is intended
> only for the people it is addressed to. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this information is 
> unauthorised and prohibited. This information may be confidential or
subject to legal privilege.
> If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender 
> immediately and delete the e-mail and any attachments.
> The Australian Communications Consumer Action Network does not warrant

> that the information in this e-mail or any attachments are free from 
> any viruses, defects, errors, interception or interference.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Internal-cg mailing list
> > Internal-cg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> > _______________________________________________
> > Internal-cg mailing list
> > Internal-cg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg




More information about the Internal-cg mailing list