[Internal-cg] Placeholder questions from ALAC

Russ Mundy mundy at tislabs.com
Mon Oct 13 07:03:11 UTC 2014

On Oct 12, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:

> When I asked Olivier for examples of orphan issues, he said: "Charging structure or the lack thereof and languages that IANA can function in.”

These sound like they are items that are outside of the current contract (unless he's saying that a $0 contract means lack of charging).  Although there may be other examples, I think these two things fall outside of the ICG remit since removing NTIA and the NTIA / ICANN contract would not have any relationship to these examples.


> Alissa
> On Oct 12, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> Alissa:
>> I'm not sure that there are any orphan issues that directly impact the IANA registries.  There are certainly issues that span more than one operational community.  Can you explain what is meant here?
>> Russ
>> On Oct 12, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>> The ALAC chair has shared a few placeholder questions with me for our Tuesday session and I wanted to pass them on:
>>> How decisions are made?
>>> How will proposals be consolidated?
>>> How does the ICG suggest handling Orphan Issues that do not fit in one or another operational community proposal?
>>> Proposals vs. Inputs -- will Inputs only be comments on the proposals? Can Inputs be any types of input?  Will inputs from ICG members be considered on the same level as Proposals?
>>> Emphasize that Accountability component is needed for all proposals coming to the ICG.
>>> Alissa
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20141013/e882f510/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list