[Internal-cg] Placeholder questions from ALAC

Subrenat, Jean-Jacques jjs at dyalog.net
Mon Oct 13 15:53:09 UTC 2014


After checking with Chair, Chair-elect and members of the ALAC, I wish to bring some "orphan issues" to your attention:
- the economic model of IANA operations, bearing in mind that it currently provides services cost-free.
- Making a stronger connection between IANA and the globalization process going ahead, e.g. in ICANN, including interpretation and translation.

Jean-Jacques.






----- Mail original -----
De: "joseph alhadeff" <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>
À: internal-cg at icann.org
Envoyé: Lundi 13 Octobre 2014 04:09:40
Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Placeholder questions from ALAC


>From an ICC-BASIS perspective I would highlight a caution that I have stated previously on behalf of our stakeholder group. The transition should be limited to the implications of what happens due to the change in NTIAs role. We are not suggesting that issues beyond that scope are not important, but rather that they may best be considered after the transition. ICC-BASIS strongly favors limiting the number and complexity of the topics that will be addressed as part of the transition to those that pertain to the transition. 

Joe 

On 10/13/2014 3:03 AM, Russ Mundy wrote: 





On Oct 12, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Alissa Cooper < alissa at cooperw.in > wrote: 




When I asked Olivier for examples of orphan issues, he said: " Charging structure or the lack thereof and languages that IANA can function in. ” 


These sound like they are items that are outside of the current contract (unless he's saying that a $0 contract means lack of charging). Although there may be other examples, I think these two things fall outside of the ICG remit since removing NTIA and the NTIA / ICANN contract would not have any relationship to these examples. 


RussM 






Alissa 


On Oct 12, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Russ Housley < housley at vigilsec.com > wrote: 



Alissa: 


I'm not sure that there are any orphan issues that directly impact the IANA registries. There are certainly issues that span more than one operational community. Can you explain what is meant here? 


Russ 





On Oct 12, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote: 



The ALAC chair has shared a few placeholder questions with me for our Tuesday session and I wanted to pass them on: 


    * How decisions are made? 
    * How will proposals be consolidated? 
    * How does the ICG suggest handling Orphan Issues that do not fit in one or another operational community proposal? 
    * Proposals vs. Inputs -- will Inputs only be comments on the proposals? Can Inputs be any types of input? Will inputs from ICG members be considered on the same level as Proposals? 
    * Emphasize that Accountability component is needed for all proposals coming to the ICG. 



Alissa 

_______________________________________________ 
Internal-cg mailing list 
Internal-cg at icann.org 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg 



_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg 

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list