[Internal-cg] Thursday session on accountability

Patrik Fältström paf at frobbit.se
Tue Oct 14 15:20:49 UTC 2014


Alissa,

For me it is not only ok. I think it is important that you be there. Regarding the issues below, I think those are ok as well.

   Patrik

On 14 okt 2014, at 08:17, joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:

> Ok for me too.
> 
> Joe
> On 10/14/2014 11:15 AM, Jon Nevett wrote:
>> Me too. Thanks. 
>> 
>> Jon
>> 
>> On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks Alissa, looks good to me.
>>> 
>>> Keith Drazek
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On Oct 14, 2014, at 7:51 AM, "Alissa Cooper" <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I have been invited to participate in the Thursday community session about enhancing ICANN accountability <http://la51.icann.org/en/schedule/thu-enhancing-accountability>. There is a large panel of speakers and I will have a 5-minute slot. I have been asked to talk about how the ICG plans to link to the parallel accountability process and what discussions have taken place about this so far.
>>>> 
>>>> Obviously we have been discussing this a bit amongst ourselves in the context of the proposal finalization process and the FAQ, both of which are on our agenda for further discussion on Friday. We also have a slot on Friday to discuss how we will liaise with the accountability CCWG. While the results of these discussions are TBD, I think there are a few points I can make, slightly expanding on what is in the FAQ:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Our charter recognizes that maintaining the accountability of Internet identifier governance is central to the transition process.
>>>> 
>>>> 2. The ICG has asked the operational communities to consider oversight and accountability — writ large, i.e., "all the ways in which oversight is conducted over the IANA functions operator’s provision of the services and activities” — in their proposals.
>>>> 
>>>> 3. After receiving consensus proposals from the operational communities regarding IANA, the ICG will conduct an analysis and assessment of their implications for ICANN accountability. We are still discussing what this analysis and assessment will entail, and this will depend somewhat on the extent to which ICANN accountability is the focus of one or more community proposals. 
>>>> 
>>>> 4. We will be having further discussion on Friday to determine how we will procedurally liaise with the accountability CCWG, including how and when we might communicate the analysis/assessment described in (3).
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> 
>>>> Alissa
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20141014/844eff64/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20141014/844eff64/signature.asc>


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list