[Internal-cg] Revised Text on Question about ICG and ICANN board
jjs at dyalog.net
Tue Oct 21 19:16:43 UTC 2014
"does not have community approval" suits me.
----- Mail original -----
De: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu>
À: "joseph alhadeff" <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>
Cc: "Jean-Jacques' 'Subrenat" <jjs at dyalog.net>, "internal-cg at icann.org" <internal-cg at icann.org>
Envoyé: Mardi 21 Octobre 2014 20:31:04
Objet: RE: [Internal-cg] Revised Text on Question about ICG and ICANN board
> -----Original Message-----
> any way beyond the normal comment process. You phrasing is in the
> nature of a statement of legal fact.
Is it? I don't think so. You read it that way, but I and many others don't. The word "law" or "legal" does not appear in there, and if you look up the ordinary dictionary definition of "authorized" it says
"having official permission or approval."
If you like we can replace the word "authorized" with "does not have community approval"
More information about the Internal-cg