[Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 21Oct14 ..
manal at tra.gov.eg
Thu Oct 23 06:08:48 UTC 2014
Yes fully agree .. Will be reflected in a new version dated Oct 23rd ..
From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:42 PM
To: Manal Ismail; internal-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until
Thanks for including my (rough) text as a third option. But I am
wondering if it belongs in Q15, or perhaps as an add-on to Q16?
Let me know where you think it fits..
From: Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 at 4:37
To: ICG List <internal-cg at icann.org>
Subject: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until
Dear All ..
Please find attached, and in Dropbox, an updated version of the ICG FAQ
reflecting comments received at the f2f meeting and over email until 21
October 2014 ..
Kindly note that I haven't crossed checked with the meeting transcripts
yet but hope the attached accurately reflects all our discussions ..
Also please note that we now have 3 alternative sentences as part of
answer to Q#15 on ICG and the ICANN Board ..
Jean-Jacques, you mentioned that you are ok with Milton's latest
suggestion, please let me know if this means that I should delete your
suggested wording ..
If you wish, please feel free to edit the file directly using track
changes and adding your initials to the file name ..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg