[Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 23Oct14 ..
mnuduma
mnuduma at yahoo.com
Sun Oct 26 18:34:02 UTC 2014
+1.
Mary Uduma
Sent from Samsung Mobile
-------- Original message --------
From: Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>
Date: 27/10/2014 01:06 (GMT+09:00)
To: Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>,paf at frobbit.se,elise.gerich at icann.org,manal at tra.gov.eg
Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until
23Oct14 ..
I think the best way to say this - simplest and most accurate - is just to delete the word board and say "ICANN is represented on the ICG by two liaisons...." Making a distinction between the board and a IANA liaison is pointless detail that may confuse ordinary readers more than it clarifies.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-
> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Alhadeff
> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 2:30 PM
> To: paf at frobbit.se; elise.gerich at icann.org; manal at tra.gov.eg
> Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until
> 23Oct14 ..
>
> We really don't need any more detail than that...
>
> Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Manal Ismail [manal at tra.gov.eg]
> Received: Saturday, 25 Oct 2014, 2:24PM
> To: Patrik Fältström [paf at frobbit.se]; Elise Gerich [elise.gerich at icann.org]
> CC: internal-cg at icann.org [internal-cg at icann.org]
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until
> 23Oct14 ..
>
> Thanks Elise, Hartmut and Patrik ..
>
>
>
> I had the same understanding too and have reflected this in earlier versions
> .. Yet I changed the text based on the latest draft shared by Jandyr on behalf
> of the small drafting group (himself, Lynn & Xiaodong), which I recall was
> also supported by Jean-Jacques and Milton ..
>
> But I see your point and am happy to revert back to the earlier text, which
> stated:
>
> “The Board is represented on the ICG by one liaison. In addition, there is a
> liaison to the ICG from the IANA Department. Both liaisons are there to
> provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the Board and ICG
> informed about the implications of the transition.”
>
>
>
> Is this ok? Should I also add the names ?
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
> --Manal
>
>
>
> From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf at frobbit.se]
> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 6:06 PM
> To: Elise Gerich
> Cc: Manal Ismail; internal-cg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until
> 23Oct14 ..
>
>
>
> I support this.
>
>
>
> Patrik
>
>
>
> On 25 okt 2014, at 17:13, Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear Manal,
>
>
>
> I thought the discussion on list had indicated that it is more accurate
> to say, ICANN is represented on the ICG by two liaisons rather than The
> Board is represented on the ICG by two liaisons. Kuo-Wei Wu is the Boards
> liaison to the ICG, and my role is a liaison from the ICANNs IANA department.
> My participation on the committee is not as a representative of the ICANN
> Board.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> -- Elise
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg <mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg>
> >
> Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 at 11:48 PM
> To: "internal-cg at icann.org <mailto:internal-cg at icann.org> "
> <internal-cg at icann.org <mailto:internal-cg at icann.org> >
> Subject: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until
> 23Oct14 ..
>
>
>
> Dear all ..
>
> Please find attached, and in Dropbox, a new version of ICG
> FAQ reflecting the latest views and comments shared .. I have also attached
> below the final compilation of answers to Q#15 & Q#16 for your convenience
> .. Kindly note that I took the liberty to change "ICG proposal" or "ICG's
> proposal" to "proposal submitted by the ICG", to avoid being misunderstood
> as attributing the community's proposal solely to the ICG .. Hope this is ok
> with everyone ..
>
> Happy to receive any further remarks or comments ..
>
> Kind Regards
>
> --Manal
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> 15. What is the role of the ICANN Board in preparing the
> proposal?
>
> The ICG is independent of the ICANN Board. The Board is
> represented on the ICG by two liaisons (Mrs. Elise Gerich, IANA Staff Expert;
> and Mr. Kuo-Wei Wu, ICANN Board Liaison), who are there to provide
> information about the IANA functions and to keep the Board and the ICG
> informed about the implications of the transition. Like any other member of
> the community, the ICANN Board can submit comments through the
> established procedures for public comment. Consistent with U.S. federal
> government procurement rules, the NTIA needs to have the final proposal
> submitted to it by the ICANN Board, but the Board does not have community
> approval to modify the proposal submitted by the ICG. When the ICG
> submits the final proposal to ICANN, it will also be released to the general
> public and to NTIA as well.
>
> 16. How will ICANN Board handle the final proposal
> submitted by the ICG?
>
> The ICG expects that the final proposal, having achieved
> consensus on the Coordination Group and within the Operational
> Communities, will be welcomed by the ICANN Board and dutifully
> transmitted to NTIA.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20141027/550044a7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list