[Internal-cg] Version 1 of the agenda

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Wed Sep 3 07:37:37 UTC 2014


Then we need to put reference to that minutes when published
WE NEED TO DO THE WORK PRPOERLY
If there is a minutes officially published and in that minutes reference
made toi the election then reference to that minutes to be made,
However, approving the minutes of a conference call is not  legal as it
reflects the views of those participated at the discussion.
Alissia and others
the issue was simple It is become more complex in referring to the minutes
Once again simple affirmation of the election as an agenda item is the only
possible way
Pls reconder it again
Regards
Kavouss



2014-09-03 9:31 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:

> Just responding to note that Samantha was on both of our last calls,
> including the one where we discussed the approval of the
> chairs/vice-chairs, and I believe she will be sending minutes for our
> review and publication.
>
> Alissa
>
> On 9/2/14, 11:50 PM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear All
> I still believe that whether or nor ICG is political or non political
> environment we need to follow normal practices that every body else
> follows..
> If in IETF or other ICANN constituencies that practice was not followed,
> it is not to me to intervene. However, as far as ICG which has been
> established pursuant to the announcement of NTIA( political or otherwise)
> we should formally approve or confirm the election or designation.
> I am n not convinced by the argument given below
> Quote
> " 1. I don’t see a real need to formally confirm/designate the
> chairs/vicechairs. This was already done with the election and the
> acceptance of the candidates and is hopefully reflected in the related
> minutes. I think we are here in a working and not in a political
> environment where such a formal step may be applicable."
> Unquote
> In the quoted paragraph it is mentioned that ' the acceptance of the
> candidates and is hopefully reflected in the related minutes"
> WHAT MINUTES.
> Dear Col;leagues
> There was some consultations ,there was poll.
> There was some outcome .
> Some voted .Some did not voted
> The results supported the Chair and two Vice chairs as contained in one of
> the last e-mail
> However, as ICG is a formal Group and its output and decisions are formal
> thus the designation /election of the Chair and two Vice chairs must be
> formally announced ,no doubt without any discussion ,what so ever ,
> I hope that you have now been briefed as you should be and kindlky agree
> to that process
>  Regards
> KAVOUSS
> I have not seen any minute( s0 as e-mail correspondence is e-mail
> correspondence and in no way is to be understood to construe as " Minutes"
> As for SUMMARY OF DECISION or WRAP UP
> I am happy that finally it is being accepted thus Patrik is kindly
> requested to include that in the agenda
>
>
> It’s clear that in case of a public statement of the meeting this
> statement has to be discussed within the ICG. I suggest put the topic
> “public statement” under AOB – just as placeholder
>
>
>
> 2014-09-02 22:19 GMT+02:00 WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>:
>
>> All,
>>
>> 1. I don’t see a real need to formally confirm/designate the
>> chairs/vicechairs. This was already done with the election and the
>> acceptance of the candidates and is hopefully reflected in the related
>> minutes. I think we are here in a working and not in a political
>> environment where such a formal step may be applicable.
>> 2. I agree that a meeting wrap-up should be done. This may be done in a
>> written form with bullet points. I would not ask for a document similar to
>> the GAC communiquees which need prior formal coordination.
>> It’s clear that in case of a public statement of the meeting this
>> statement has to be discussed within the ICG. I suggest put the topic
>> “public statement” under AOB – just as placeholder.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>
>> *From:* Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 02, 2014 12:54 PM
>> *To:* Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se>
>> *Cc:* Coordination Group <internal-cg at icann.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] Version 1 of the agenda
>>
>> Dear Patrik
>> Dear All
>> I humbly and once again suggest to add the two following items to the
>> agenda
>> 1.  Confirmation/formal  Designation of  Chair and Vice Chairs, at the
>> very beginning
>> 2  Approval of Summary of conclusion reached/ decision made ( this
>> summary should be prepared by chair and approved at the meeting)
>> Kavouss
>>
>>
>> 2014-09-02 12:06 GMT+02:00 Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se>:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Can you who feel the most for the respective Agenda Items send me
>>> information you have, and I will try to add to the agenda so that it is
>>> more easy to understand. For example objectives.
>>>
>>>    Patrik
>>>
>>> On 2 sep 2014, at 12:19, Lynn St.Amour <Lynn at LStAmour.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks Patrik,
>>> >
>>> > I think the main issues are captured.
>>> >
>>> > Could I also suggest that for each item, the "agenda item leader" add
>>> a short statement of what we expect to accomplish (or a Purpose statement)
>>> as well as a link to the appropriate documents.  This will help remote
>>> participants (and may even help the ICG focus).
>>> >
>>> > For example:
>>> >
>>> > - IANA Functions Transition Request for Proposals “RFP”
>>> >       Objective:   Approve RFP
>>> >                       Approve Timeline
>>> >                       etc…
>>> > Best,
>>> > Lynn
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sep 2, 2014, at 12:47 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> All,
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks for the comments. Version 1 of the agenda is just released
>>> where I have tried to move things around, re-allocated time slots etc
>>> according to the feedback.
>>> >>
>>> >> I have still not validated time for lunch, coffee break and
>>> translators. Those outside events might impact time allocation.
>>> >>
>>> >> Patrik
>>> >> <Agenda ICG meeting Istanbul-v1.doc>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> >> Internal-cg at icann.org
>>> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140903/d810c00b/attachment.html>


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list