[Internal-cg] consensus building

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Wed Sep 3 14:57:09 UTC 2014


Dear All,
I am sorry to core back to you,
Version 5  on Mailing is not acceptable to see since there are many
problems with that version
Still several points that I sent you  eartlier were not taken into account.
Please kindly look at the last version of my proposal as attached to my
last but one e-mail.
Regards
Kavouss


2014-09-03 12:34 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> version 5 still does not cover many iof my points
> Pls read the file as attached to my previous mail
> Regards
> KAVOUSS
>
>
>
> 2014-09-03 12:31 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
>
> v5 is attached. I would send the dropbox link but I’m having dropbox
>> connectivity problems.
>>
>> On 9/3/14, 1:28 PM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Friend
>> I do not know what is in version 5
>> Pls look at the attached doc.
>> KAVOUSS
>>
>>
>> 2014-09-03 12:23 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
>>
>>> On 9/3/14, 1:10 PM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I do not know what we are dealing here
>>>
>>>
>>> I was commenting on v5 circulated by Wolf-Ulrich. That version has text
>>> in it that I find problematic, as indicated in my email. The v4 version you
>>> circulated does not contain that language. As I will not be present on Sept
>>> 6, I’m trying to get my comments to the mailing list in advance of the
>>> meeting.
>>>
>>> Alissa
>>>
>>> Please kindly read my doc on consensus building sent to you last night
>>> Vrsion 4
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-09-03 10:28 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
>>>
>>>> Wolf-Ulrich,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your work on this.
>>>>
>>>> On 9/2/14, 1:19 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >* “small minority”: should further be discussed. I added
>>>> >  the condition that a recommendation is not reached if at least one of
>>>> >the ICG
>>>> >  communities (according to the list) as a whole is firmly and formally
>>>> >opposed.
>>>> >  That would mean a formal written objection by the community
>>>> leadership
>>>> >on
>>>> >  behalf of their community.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> I’m not sure this matches what was being discussed on the list. If we
>>>> use
>>>> the text Martin had suggested, I think the third bullet under section
>>>> 4(b)
>>>> should read:
>>>>
>>>> "After enough time has passed for the ICG to consider and attempt to
>>>> accommodate objections, the ICG can reach a conclusion if at most a
>>>> small
>>>> minority disagrees and their objections have been documented.  It is not
>>>> expected that the representatives of an operational community
>>>> significantly and directly affected by a conclusion would be overruled
>>>> in
>>>> this process.”
>>>>
>>>> Alissa
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140903/24138326/attachment.html>


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list