[Internal-cg] consensus building

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Thu Sep 4 03:20:01 UTC 2014


Dear All,
It is surprising that you continue to commenting on something that we have
several difficulties with
I did sent you a full amended text as rev 4 two days ago providing all
amemndments with reasons for each of them
We have difficulties with version 5 which is placed on drop box
we can not accept that and we need to fully take into account the proposed
changed that I have sent to you before
DISAGREEMENT WITH V5 AS POSTED IN DROP BOX
KAVOUSS


2014-09-03 23:08 GMT+02:00 Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk>:

> Thank you Alissa:  this reflects my concerns well.  I note that we did
> this discussion entirely by e-mail, so I can understand how Wolf-Ulrich
> missed it.
>
> I have a couple of other comments - all are in the marked-up draft
> attached and placed in drop-box.
>
> Best
>
> Martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org]
> On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper
> Sent: 03 September 2014 11:29
> To: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben; internal-cg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] consensus building
>
> Wolf-Ulrich,
>
> Thanks for your work on this.
>
> On 9/2/14, 1:19 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> wrote:
> >
> >* “small minority”: should further be discussed. I added
> >  the condition that a recommendation is not reached if at least one of
> >the ICG
> >  communities (according to the list) as a whole is firmly and formally
> >opposed.
> >  That would mean a formal written objection by the community
> >leadership on
> >  behalf of their community.
> >
>
> I’m not sure this matches what was being discussed on the list. If we use
> the text Martin had suggested, I think the third bullet under section 4(b)
> should read:
>
> "After enough time has passed for the ICG to consider and attempt to
> accommodate objections, the ICG can reach a conclusion if at most a small
> minority disagrees and their objections have been documented.  It is not
> expected that the representatives of an operational community significantly
> and directly affected by a conclusion would be overruled in this process.”
>
> Alissa
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140904/442a9c13/attachment.html>


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list