[Internal-cg] Posting of draft RFP

[Patrik Fältström]

On 5 sep 2014, at 10:17, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

> Patrik, I sympathize that you are probably very busy, so that statement above on 'working with ICANN' was probably written in a rush, but I want to know more about how this is being handled, and the phrase 'coming up with issues that makes this clear' is not very helpful. Can you be more specific on what you are doing with ICANN?

FWIW, I have seen at least Adiel and Daniel correct the various postings made.

Grace, that did the posting, is *not* our support staff.

I wrote back to our support staff the following:

> Alice, Ergys, 
> 
> What Alissa requested was to have the draft RFP posted. Nothing more, nothing less.
> 
> Can you Alice and Ergys in cooperation with others at ICANN come with some suggestion on how to either reword the announcement and/or send a new?
> 
>    Patrik


This as an ability for me to (for example) see what you in the ICG suggest we request ICANN to do.

   Patrik

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140905/3c698d87/signature.asc>