[Internal-cg] Doodle poll for two (2) telephone conferences

[Paul Wilson]

Dear Kavouss, 

my apologies but I do not entirely understand your email, especially the first part.  Maybe is was not complete when you sent it?

Thanks,

Paul






On 12 Sep 2014, at 5:43 am, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear All,
> G11 after the formal closure of ICG met and agreed on some principles
> I did implement those priciples several colleagues like Wolf, Jari ,Manal commented
> Those comments were implemented.
> Some editorial  and corrections were also made.
> Martin wanted more time.
> However, all of a sudden another ICG totally up side down the process and disagee with the basic principle that was almost agreed i.e. case by case.approach
> This sort of reaction is not productive nor constructive
> If someone pushes for its own views and bring us bacjk to square one we never be able to discuss that consensus building document on 17
> Tomorrow is 12 ,Saturday and Suday are off We have only Monday and on Tuesday 16 WE HAVE TO WARP UP.
> Regards
> Kavouss
> 
> 2014-09-11 17:12 GMT+02:00 <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de>:
> Milton, cherry- picking should be not permitted - by consensus!😉
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> Sent from my personal phone
> 
> > Am 11.09.2014 um 17:05 schrieb Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>:
> >
> > Ah, the "consensus" document. Luckily for me I will be on airplanes that whole time on the 17th ;-)
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf at frobbit.se]
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 9:37 AM
> >> To: Milton L Mueller
> >> Cc: ICG
> >> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Doodle poll for two (2) telephone conferences
> >>
> >> Milton,
> >>
> >> I think we can only have one topic per call, and we definitely need one call on
> >> the 17th for the consensus document. Whether we need the 2nd is something
> >> we can discuss when we are say one week away from that call -- at which time it
> >> can be cancelled.
> >>
> >>   Patrik
> >>
> >>> On 11 Sep 2014, at 15:32, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I am not sure why we need two of these calls.
> >>> Wouldn't one do? We just had a meeting and we will have another one in LA.
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
> >>>> [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org]
> >>>> On Behalf Of Patrik Fältström
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 2:09 AM
> >>>> To: ICG
> >>>> Subject: [Internal-cg] Doodle poll for two (2) telephone conferences
> >>>>
> >>>> All,
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is the Doodle poll that I promised that is about the two next
> >>>> telephone calls before our meeting in Los Angeles.
> >>>>
> >>>> As agreed, the first is around 20:00 UTC on Sep 17, and the 2nd
> >>>> around 04:00 UTC on Oct 1.
> >>>>
> >>>> The first is in fact the earliest starting at 20:00 as the
> >>>> interpreters for FR is having another call until 20:00, so we can not start
> >> earlier than 20:00.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please mark your availability with "yes"/"maybe"/"no" at the
> >>>> following web
> >>>> page:
> >>>>
> >>>> <http://doodle.com/3xuuv4vawv5hrn56>
> >>>>
> >>>> Responses no later than 23:59 UTC on Monday Sep 15.
> >>>>
> >>>>  Patrik Fältström
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Internal-cg mailing list
> > Internal-cg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg