[Internal-cg] ICG FAQ ..

[Manal Ismail]

From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu] 



 

From: Manal Ismail [mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg] 

[MI]: Noted .. will add it to the new version that is to be circulated
shortly .. Although, personally, I would be reluctant to leave the last
sentence "But the ICG cannot give these objections any weight if the
person made no effort to participate in the operational
community-convened process." .. I think it's a bit negative and I don't
think it adds ..  

 

 

J Perhaps it does sound a bit negative, but I don't want people to get
the (wrong) idea that they can short-circuit the process and appeal to
us to get their ideas implemented. Can you think of a better way to
phrase it? 

 

[MI]: J .. Does any of the following work?

-          "If you think your ideas have been ignored or not fairly
treated in the OC proposal development process, you can express this
view directly to the ICG or in the public comment period.  But, of
course, this will be possible only if you have already participated in
the relevant operational community-convened process."  or 

-          "If you think your ideas have been ignored or not fairly
treated in the OC proposal development process, you can express this
view directly to the ICG or in the public comment period.  But, of
course, this won't be possible unless you have already participated in
the relevant operational community-convened process. "

 

Milton L. Mueller

Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor

Syracuse University School of Information Studies

http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/mueller/Home.html
<http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/mueller/Home.html>  

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140930/843cf5f5/attachment.html>