[Internal-cg] Community Comments Handling Process ..
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Mon Feb 2 15:00:33 UTC 2015
i fully agree with that. and i have explicitly said that at least two times. again: i absolutely agree that we can decide to ask an explicit question to an oc using our normal process. it requires an icg member to suggest it and the icg to decide to do it using our normal process.
Sent from a hand held device.
> On 02.02.2015, at 13:30, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
> Dear All,
> Yes we are not appeal body, but we represent the 13 ICANN community and our Charter allow us to request the Operational Community to duly and carefully examine the " concerns " or " Comments " received and provide answers7 clarification or justification for action was taken and make remedial action ,if and where required.
> Kavouss t
> 2015-02-02 8:59 GMT+01:00 Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>:
>> On 1.02.15 19:30 , Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> you understood my points completely. I am confident that the OCs, having spent considerable effort and process to create their proposals, will publicly respond to substantial comments.
>> Yes we are dealing with people. And just because we are dealing with people we have to be careful not to create the impression that the ICG is an appeals body with an obligation for due process and an obligation to respond to each and every comment.
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg