[Internal-cg] Review of Protocol Parameters and Numbers Proposals for completeness

Alissa Cooper alissa at cooperw.in
Thu Feb 5 23:13:10 UTC 2015

Thanks for sharing this, Patrik.

Under B.1, on page 6, you say "The Protocol Parameters proposal suggest transfer of the domain name to the IETF Trust.” This is not correct. The numbers proposal is the one that suggests this.


On Feb 5, 2015, at 1:32 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:

> Hi,
> I have spent some time looking at the Numbers and Protocol Parameters proposals in parallel with the IANA Contract and specifically the ICANN Response to the RFP. The goal was to try to identify gaps or overlaps that the proposals did not take into account.
> Specifically, I looked at two areas:
> - The registries related to IP addresses and AS numbers
> - The IANA.ORG domain name
> I did add the summary of my review in my assessment of the Numbers Proposal where I did start with Wulf Ulrich excellent work (and that is why you see much text in my assessment that is exactly the same words as in his assessment).
> My assessment is in the dropbox and also attached to this email.
>    Patrik
> <numbers-proposal-assessment-paf.doc>_______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list