[Internal-cg] Proposed question for the protocols OC
housley at vigilsec.com
Sat Feb 7 02:50:53 UTC 2015
Please change "protocols proposal" to "protocol parameters proposal".
Please change "protocols community" to "protocol parameters community".
On Feb 6, 2015, at 8:34 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> Based on feedback from numbers, another slight revision:
> “The IETF IANAPLAN WG did not think a formal request to change the arrangements regarding the IANA trademark and the iana.org domain was a requirement of its transition proposal. But Section III.A.2 of the RIR proposal says "With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, it is the expectation of the Internet Number Community that both are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a particular IANA Numbering Services Operator." The numbers proposal sees these changes as a requirement of the transition and the protocols proposal does not. If these aspects of the proposals are perceived as incompatible would the numbers and protocols communities be willing to modify their proposals to reconcile them?"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg