[Internal-cg] Larry's comments at GAC

[Mary Uduma]

I think this sounds like a confirmation of our discussion on time line and the issue of incremental work of the ICG regarding the 2 submitted proposals from Numbers and Protocol Parameters. 

I think we did conclude that there would be no submission of a  partial proposal.
I agree we add to the questions.


Mary Uduma
 

     On Sunday, February 8, 2015 11:14 AM, Narelle Clark <narelle.clark at accan.org.au> wrote:
   

 
Joe
It should be addressed in section IV bullet point 5 from our RFP.

Therefore the assessments should apply due diligence there also.



Narelle





--


Narelle Clark
Director of Operations - Deputy CEO

Australian Communications
Consumer Action Network
Suite 402
Level 4, 55 Mountain St
Ultimo NSW 2007
Ph: 02 9288 4000
Direct: 02 9288 4007
Fax: 02 9288 4019
TTY: 02 9281 5322




 joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:


Two statements of interest:

1.  Don't even bother me with a partial proposal...

2.  He pushed the names community to provide information on how long it
would take them to implement the proposal?  Is that something we should
add more specifically to our questions?  I don't think we've explored
that dimension too much?

Joe
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150208/405b2945/attachment.html>