[Internal-cg] Larry's comments at GAC
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Feb 10 16:29:58 UTC 2015
Yes not endless-patience but enough time to do it properly. Some of us are in hurry to make " vite fait , male faut" but not all if us.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 8 Feb 2015, at 16:08, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:
>> On 8.02.15 11:09 , Narelle Clark wrote:
>> It should be addressed in section IV bullet point 5 from our RFP.
>> Therefore the assessments should apply due diligence there also.
> Narelle is right. Our RFP asks the question and the proposals received so far are clear enough for me. No worries Joe. ;-)
> Also: This is just another way for Larry to ask the names: "Ain't that a little too complicated?" Which I read to mean: "Do you really think this can happen during our administration?"
> In case it is not clear to all of us: A lot of those complicating the names process may very well do so with the hope to delay enough until the administration changes in the vain hope that this process will be stopped then.
> This is also the reason why I expect the other OCs not to have endless patience.
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
More information about the Internal-cg