[Internal-cg] statement Steve Crocker
theresa.swinehart at icann.org
Thu Feb 12 09:34:49 UTC 2015
Please find below the complete statement Steve read.
We have received several questions requesting clarification as to how ICANN will handle receipt of the proposal from the ICG and the Work Stream 1 proposal from the CCWG. We hope the following will be helpful.
NTIA is expecting coordinated proposals from both groups. They cannot act on just one. Further, they expect the ICG proposal will take into account the accountability mechanisms proposed by the CCWG. We are heartened by the close coordination between the groups, including liaisons from the ICG to the CCWG. ICANN is expecting to receive both proposals at roughly the same time. When ICANN receives these proposals, we will forward them promptly and without modification to NTIA. As we have previously stated, if we do submit the proposals with an accompanying communication of comments, they will be on points we had already shared with the community during the development of the proposals.
We therefore encourage the groups to continue coordinating closely to ensure ICANN receives the proposals together and is able to provide them to NTIA in a coordinated manner.
With respect to improvements in our accountability, we are definitely open to improvements.
Sent from my mobile device
On Feb 12, 2015, at 17:26, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>> wrote:
Thanks Theresa, looking forward to the complete statement.
From: Theresa Swinehart<mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 5:16 PM
To: WUKnoben<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
Cc: ispcp-iana at ispcp.info<mailto:ispcp-iana at ispcp.info> ; internal-cg at icann.org<mailto:internal-cg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] statement Steve Crocker
The scribes didn't capture the entire statement Steve read. Will send it shortly.
Sent from my mobile device
On Feb 12, 2015, at 17:09, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>> wrote:
Steve Crockers statement on behalf of the ICANN Board done at the ICANN Public Forum today:
LET ME GO TO THE STATEMENT RELATED TO THE PROPOSALS HERE.
SO WE HAVE RECEIVED SEVERAL QUESTIONS REGARDING -- REQUESTING CLARIFICATION AS TO HOW ICANN WILL HANDLE RECEIPT OF THE PROPOSAL FROM THE ICG AND THE WORK STREAM ONE PROPOSAL FROM THE CCWG. WE HOPE THE FOLLOWING WILL BE HELPFUL.
NTIA IS EXPECTING COORDINATED PROPOSALS FROM BOTH GROUPS. THEY CANNOT ACT ON JUST ONE.
FURTHER, THEY EXPECT THE ICG PROPOSAL WILL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS PROPOSED BY THE CCWG. WE ARE HEARTENED IN OUR OWN ACCOUNTABILITY CCWG'S PROPOSAL. SO I HOPE THAT'S HELPFUL. WE'VE TRIED TO LISTEN CAREFULLY TO THE DISPARATE NUANCES OF WHAT OTHERWISE ARE ALL INTENDED TO AIM AT THE SAME TARGET.
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org<mailto:Internal-cg at icann.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg