[Internal-cg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] Next steps?

Tue Feb 24 21:09:15 UTC 2015

Thanks Alissa,

here I understand Izumi describing the responsibilities of CRISP vs RIRs. Depending on the level of implementation details needed for the proposal further action may be required (e.g. draft charter of the Review Committee).

Looking forward to here you later

Wolf-Ulrich

From: Alissa Cooper 
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 9:44 PM
To: ICG 
Subject: [Internal-cg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] Next steps?

This is relevant to some of the questions Wolf-Ulrich has raised about implementation, so I’m forwarding it.

Begin forwarded message:

  From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>

  Subject: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Next steps?

  Date: January 26, 2015 at 6:12:27 PM PST

  To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>

  Cc: "ianaxfer at nro.net" <ianaxfer at nro.net>

  Hello Seun and colleagues on the IANAXFER list,

  Thank you once again Seun for your question about the next steps.
  I think this is a useful question for others in the community as well.

  As you are aware, our proposal to the ICG describes high level
  principles about the Review Committee and the SLA including "IANA
  Service Level Agreement Principles" in the proposal, so RIRs will
  consider implementation based on this guidance.

  Our role as the CRISP team is to provide guidance to the RIRs in
  the implementation of the proposal, and the details and process of
  implementation of the proposal is the responsibility of the RIRs. The
  charter of the review committee and actual contract text are part of
  implementation of the proposal which is the responsibility of the RIRs.

  Having said this, the CRISP Team believes it is important for the
  community to have clear visibility that RIRs acknowledges this proposal
  which references actions by them.

  Therefore, after Step2 of the ICG's latest timeline, when the proposals
  by all three operational communities are consolidated by the ICG, the
  CRISP Team plans to formally inform the executives of the RIRs about the
  proposal submitted to the ICG which references actions by the RIRs.

  https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icg-process-timeline-07jan15-en.pdf

  We expect that there will be formal acknowledgement from the five RIRs
  about this, so it is clear to the community that the RIRs will take the
  appropriate steps to implement the proposal from the Number Resources
  community. We trust each RIR will consult with their respective
  communities as needed in preparing the SLA, and the Review Committee is
  to be established in an open and bottom-up manner, as we have described
  in the proposal.

  I hope this clarifies the role of the CRISP team and RIRs in future steps.

  Regards,
  Izumi Okutani
  The CRISP Team

  On 2015/01/22 23:45, Seun Ojedeji wrote:

    Great thanks for the first level clarification Izumi.

    Cheers!

    On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

      Hello Seun,

      Just from what I can answer for now,

          - SLA requirements

      "IANA Service Level Agreement Principles" are described in Section
      III.A.3 of our proposal, as you are probably aware. This lists
      principles and elements to be included in the SLA.

      Both of the processes listed below will be lead by the RIRs and not the
      CRISP Team. I trust the RIRs will start the process, so that we have
      these them ready before the transition.

          - Charter of review committee
          - Contract actual text

      I need to double check if there is anything more we can say at this
      stage as the CRISP Team - Thanks for your question and patience!

      Regards,
      Izumi

      On 2015/01/22 13:29, Seun Ojedeji wrote:

        Hello Izumi,

        You may have missed this mail, could you/or any crisp team kindly provide
        update?

        Just to clarify (in line of recent development), not all the 3 items are
        expected to be developed by this WG but will be good to know when those
        processes will start.

        Thanks

        sent from Google nexus 4
        kindly excuse brevity and typos.
        On 21 Jan 2015 09:37, "Seun Ojedeji" <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:

          Hello Izumi, CRISP team

          Thanks again to you and the entire team. I just want to ask about what

      the

          next line of action will be? i.e are we to wait until the ICG release

      their

          final proposal? or while we wait on ICG, we also start the drafting

      process

          for the following:

          - Charter of review committee
          - SLA requirements
          - Contract actual text

          Thanks as i look forward to your response

          Regards

          --
          ------------------------------------------------------------------------

          *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:
          http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile:

      +2348035233535**alt

          email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
          <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

          The key to understanding is humility - my view !

  _______________________________________________
  ianaxfer mailing list
  ianaxfer at nro.net
  https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150224/c62ecd05/attachment-0001.html>