[Internal-cg] Finalizing the comments proposal

Daniel Karrenberg daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Wed Feb 25 06:39:47 UTC 2015

This is exactly my understanding and "Handling community comments 
submitted to the ICG Forum Discussion Draft based on Singapore Meeting 
11 February 2015 - V.1" implements that. If clarification is needed, can 
we hear proposed text?


On 25.02.15 5:38 , joseph alhadeff wrote:
> Kavouss:
> By way of clarification, I think you are highlighting a confusion in the
> drafting which we need to clarify.
> If ICG poses a question to a community related to a proposal, whether
> originated by us or one that we receive which we believe needs to be
> addressed , it must be answered - there is no latitude in that.
> The more voluntary language was meant only to address an individual
> question which has come to us form an individual or group outside of the
> ICG which we don't require an answer to.  While we suggest that the
> community endeavor to address those, as appropriate, we do not require
> that those questions be answered in an individualized manner.
> Clearly the current draft, is resulting in confusion and needs to be
> clarified.
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list