[Internal-cg] IETF response to ICG

[Jari Arkko]

Dear all,

As you know, the IETF has been working on the protocol parameters
aspects of the transition. We created the IANAPLAN working group, 
developed a proposed response, and held community discussions. 
And of course, there has been a lot of past evolution in this space 
as well.

This part of the process is coming to an end from our side. Our 
steering group, the IESG, approved the proposed response on 
December 18, and after some minor editorial changes, the 
document has been formally approved today, January 6.

The link to our proposal is below, and we look forward to working
with the ICG and other communities on the next steps. We are
committed to ensuring a good outcome for the Internet in
this topic.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-09

Jari Arkko

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150106/8e0b4d08/signature.asc>