[Internal-cg] Thinking about the assessment process

Russ Housley housley at vigilsec.com
Wed Jan 7 23:24:55 UTC 2015

I was heavily involved in the protocol parameters response from the IETT.  I have not been involved with the creation of the responses from the names or number communities beyond reading publicly available documents.


On Jan 7, 2015, at 3:31 AM, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:

> I suggest that before we start the reviews each of us sends a message to this list describing their involvement, if any, in the development of proposals. This way all that is on record and we avoid accusations of hidden interests or actions.
> For myself I can state that I have had no involvement with the proposals of the names and protocol parameters communities.
> As a member of the RIPE community I have participated in the public discussion about the principles for the numbers proposal. As part of my job at the RIPE NCC I have provided advice to management about the development of the proposal. I have also worked actively within the RIR communities to explain the process and the work of the ICG.

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list