[Internal-cg] Note to CWG re timeline?

WUKnoben wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Thu Jan 15 10:27:20 UTC 2015

Thanks Alissa,

a note would be helpful.

With regards to the text I suggest asking the CWG also - in case of time revision - what are the major challenges they encounter (e.g. coordination with CCWG-accountability).

I've tried to insert it in your draft (see below). Please feel free to polish.



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
From: Alissa Cooper 
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 11:21 PM 
To: ICG 
Subject: [Internal-cg] Note to CWG re timeline? 

Wolf-Ulrich suggested on the call today that we send a note to the CWG to obtain more information about their expected timeline if it does indeed slip. I’m happy to send such a note if people agree. I’ve drafted something up below.

What do others think? Should we send a note? What do you think of the text below?



Dear CWG,

The ICG has been following the developments in all of the operational communities, including the naming community. We have noted some discussions about the possibility that the CWG might require additional time to complete its response to the ICG RFP beyond its original planned submission date of January 30, 2015. We would ask that if you decide to revise your estimated completion date that you share with the ICG your revised expected timeline.
You may also indicate the CWG’s major challenges leading to the revision and whether the ICG is deemed to coordinate here.

Thank you,
Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150115/542ce28a/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list