[Internal-cg] Jan 26 review deadline for Protocols proposal
joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Thu Jan 15 16:59:39 UTC 2015
If we had one proposal reviewed by Singapore it could be a test of our
review process and help flesh out any issues we see in our intake/review
process. It would not help us progress very far towards assembling a
proposal, but might help us streamline how we review further proposals?
Agree though on not jeopardizing the work needed in the names community.
On 1/15/2015 10:43 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> I’ve been looking at the total landscape related to IANA transition
> and I have a question about the Jan 26 deadline for reviewing the IETF
> There is a ton of work going on in the names CWG and CCWG in that time
> frame, and given the relatively unfinished state of the names work I
> think it’s more important to advance that work.
> At the same time, I am having trouble understanding what we can do
> with a review of the protocols proposal by Jan 26. Is the purpose to
> be able to discuss it at the Singapore meeting, or what?
> Milton L Mueller
> Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
> Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org <http://internetgovernance.org/>
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg