[Internal-cg] Jan 26 review deadline for Protocols proposal

joseph alhadeff joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Thu Jan 15 16:59:39 UTC 2015

If we had one proposal reviewed by Singapore it could be a test of our 
review process and help flesh out any issues we see in our intake/review 
process.  It would not help us progress very far towards assembling a 
proposal, but might help us streamline how we review further proposals?  
Agree though on not jeopardizing the work needed in the names community.
On 1/15/2015 10:43 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> I’ve been looking at the total landscape related to IANA transition 
> and I have a question about the Jan 26 deadline for reviewing the IETF 
> proposal.
> There is a ton of work going on in the names CWG and CCWG in that time 
> frame, and given the relatively unfinished state of the names work I 
> think it’s more important to advance that work.
> At the same time, I am having trouble understanding what we can do 
> with a review of the protocols proposal by Jan 26. Is the purpose to 
> be able to discuss it at the Singapore meeting, or what?
> Milton L Mueller
> Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
> Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org <http://internetgovernance.org/>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150115/2a09dd72/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list