[Internal-cg] Jan 26 review deadline for Protocols proposal
alissa at cooperw.in
Thu Jan 15 18:08:44 UTC 2015
I suggested Jan 26 because our next call is on Jan 28. That way we can devote a good part of that call to starting the discussion about the protocol parameters proposal. We can continue that discussion in Singapore.
Since Step I of our finalization process involves evaluating the proposals individually <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/iana-transition-assembly-finalization-24dec14-en.pdf>, I think we can and should proceed with that step for the proposals we do receive. We’re aiming to get that done by Feb 15 according to our process.
Of course, the names work taking place right now is very important and folks who are heavily involved in that might not have as much time to review the protocol parameters proposal. I think that’s perfectly fine, since we have a couple people on the hook to do a thorough review of that proposal and bring their evaluations back to the rest of us.
On Jan 15, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
> I’ve been looking at the total landscape related to IANA transition and I have a question about the Jan 26 deadline for reviewing the IETF proposal.
> There is a ton of work going on in the names CWG and CCWG in that time frame, and given the relatively unfinished state of the names work I think it’s more important to advance that work.
> At the same time, I am having trouble understanding what we can do with a review of the protocols proposal by Jan 26. Is the purpose to be able to discuss it at the Singapore meeting, or what?
> Milton L Mueller
> Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
> Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> Internet Governance Project
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg