[Internal-cg] Jan 26 review deadline for Protocols proposal

[Jari Arkko]

FWIW I also agree with what Daniel and Alissa were saying. I think we need to get started on the evaluations. We have enough manpower to do some parallel processing, and it would be very, very good to show some progress in our next call and the ICANN meeting about this.

FYI I have made some progress in filling out the template evaluation, and will soon have some initial drafty text for the team. I can say that it probably is a useful exercise to run the evaluation for the proposals that we have, we will learn a lot about doing those evaluations. We should be able to progress at least on the individual proposal level, as well as numbers - parameters compatibility front.

Jari

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150117/1ea3be5d/signature-0001.asc>