[Internal-cg] Minor addition to the proposal assessment form
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Mon Jan 19 14:47:09 UTC 2015
OK! I was wondering how that slipped through ...
I plead temporary loss of receptive abilities due to the flu.
On 19.01.15 15:41 , Alissa Cooper wrote:
> I made this change — attached and in Dropbox
> Daniel: The RFP itself has the correct list of criteria
> so the communities got the correct information to begin with. The error
> was in our assessment sheet.
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 2:38 AM, Daniel Karrenberg
> <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net <mailto:daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>> wrote:
>> On 19.01.15 4:38 , Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>> Section B3 of the assessment form refers to the 4 NTIA “principles” as
>>> the NTIA criteria. These are:
>>> * Support and enhance the multistakeholder model;
>>> * Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS;
>>> * Meet the needs and expectation of the global customers and partners
>>> of the IANA services; and,
>>> * Maintain the openness of the Internet.
>>> In addition, however, the NTIA stated that: “NTIA will not accept a
>>> proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a government-led or an
>>> inter-governmental organization solution.”
>>> I believe this should be added to B3 as a fifth criterion that must
>>> be met.
>>> Milton L Mueller
>>> Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
>>> Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>>> Internet Governance Project
>>> http://internetgovernance.org <http://internetgovernance.org/>
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> I agree.
>> We should also notify the operational communities explicitly of this
>> and state clearly that this is not due to our whim but due to an
>> earlier mistake on our part as we forgot to correctly include the NTIA
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org <mailto:Internal-cg at icann.org>
More information about the Internal-cg