[Internal-cg] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process

[Jari Arkko]

I’ll add that Richard has repeatedly made a similar concerns known during several stages of the IETF process. So, I think the answer to A2 is indeed yes.

Who has the token of the protocol parameters assessment editing? You, Milton?

Jari

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150119/d05f7ba2/signature.asc>