[Internal-cg] Handling process complaints

[WUKnoben]

I think we are not in disagreement about what options are given to handle the complaints.

At least the numbering Community (CRISP) pointed out on their respective mailing list that they expect guidance from the ICG. We should discuss it tomorrow.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich



From: Kavouss Arasteh 
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 7:38 PM
To: Alissa Cooper 
Cc: ICG 
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Handling process complaints

Alissa,
You mentioned that you did not undertstand me .
I repeat what I said.
1.It seems that we have received commubnity  process  compèlaints .
2. You want to discuss how we should handle these compklaints 
3 These complaints were sent to the operating  communitites
4 We need to establish deadline  to receivive replies from operating communities   
5. You wish to establish deadline for receiving complaints .
6. Once we decide on that, we have to make a statement informing the communities to send comments .if any within that deadline
7. We will send the additional complaints, if any to operating community
8. We need to establish another dealine or maintain the same deadliner   to receivive replies from operating communities  for the second and last complaints
9. icg NEED TO EXAMINE THE ENTIRE REPLIES  FROM OPERATING COMMUNITIES   INCLUDING THEIR  COMMENTS ON COMPLAINTS   

I hope that it would be clear now
Regards
Kavouss 


2015-01-26 22:32 GMT+01:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:

  I’ve included an item on the draft agenda for the January 28 call about handling community process complaints. We have received a few: 

  Richard Hill on IETF process: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00017.html
  Richard Hill on RIR process: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00020.html
  Guru Acharya on RIR process: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00024.html

  And there are some follow-up messages that you can see on the forum. http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/

  I’ve been forwarding these to the appropriate communities, but I think we need to be a little clearer about what we are expecting here. If we want responses from the communities, we should ask for them directly. If we go down that route, we should probably set a deadline for receiving complaints about this first phase of the process so that we can give the communities clear guidance about what they need to respond to and when.

  We can discuss this on the call but I wanted to get the discussion going on the mailing list first.

  Thanks,
  Alissa

  _______________________________________________
  Internal-cg mailing list
  Internal-cg at icann.org
  https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150127/1e1bce1d/attachment.html>