[Internal-cg] Community Comments Handling Process ..

[joseph alhadeff]

The only addition I would make is to highlight if we believe that the 
comment addresses a missing element of the application.  Recall that in 
our own process we have an obligation to be responsive to the applicant 
related to things that may be incomplete of missing in the application...
On 1/29/2015 4:31 PM, Mary Uduma wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I want to first apologize for being unable to fully participate in the 
> call yesterday.
> I am in agreement with the proposal from Manal on responses to 
> comments on handling community process.
> I think ICG's task ends when  such comments  are forwarded to the 
> relevant community, the onus lies with the community to respond and 
> fix any concerns that are highlighted by the commenter in line with 
> the ICG RFP.
> It would help ICG's process if timelines for responses are determined 
> and communicated to the community in question.
> Thank you Manal
> Mary Uduma
>
>
> On Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:28 AM, Manal Ismail 
> <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:
>
>
> Dear All ..
> Please find attached an initial draft which I hope grasps the essence 
> of what has been discussed on the call yesterday ..
> Thought to await your feedback first before adding on Dropbox ..
> Kind Regards
> --Manal
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org <mailto:Internal-cg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150130/6697b147/attachment.html>