<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;">My only concern is with this text:</span><div style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;"><br></div><div><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><blockquote type="cite"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><span class="s4">While there is some overlap among </span><span class="s4">all of</span><span class="s4">these categories, each poses distinct organizational, operational and technical issues</span><span class="s4">,</span><span class="s4"> and each </span><span class="s4">tends to have</span><span class="s4"> </span><span class="s4">distinct </span><span class="s4">communities of interest and expertise. For those reasons it is best to have work on the three categories of IANA parameters proceed </span><span class="s4">autonomously </span><span class="s4">in parallel and be </span><span class="s4">based</span><span class="s4"> in the respective </span><span class="s4">communities</span><span class="s4">.</span></span></blockquote></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"> </span></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">I do not see the constituencies so very distinct. Where is gac? Where is SSAC? Where is ICC?</span></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">I do not mind having text referring to the respective PDPs but should not be used to exclude comments from those not directly involved in the PDPs. This also goes back to what I think ICANN need to improve.</span></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;">Maybe you have talked about this (one case of "distinct" is removed, good) but I propose small change like:</span></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;"><br></span></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><span class="s4">While there is some overlap among </span><span class="s4">all of</span><span class="s4">these categories, each poses different organizational, operational and technical issues</span><span class="s4">,</span><span class="s4"> and each </span><span class="s4">tends to have</span><span class="s4"> </span><span class="s4">different </span><span class="s4">communities of interest and expertise. For those reasons it is best to have work on the three categories of IANA parameters proceed </span><span class="s4">autonomously </span><span class="s4">in parallel and be mainly </span><span class="s4">based</span><span class="s4"> in the respective </span><span class="s4">communities</span><span class="s4">.</span></span></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><span class="s4"><br></span></span></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><span class="s4"> Patrik</span></span></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><span class="s4"><br></span></span></p><p class="s3" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"> </span></p></div></body></html>