<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;">Milton, </span><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Wolf-Ulrich, Jari</span></div><div><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></div><div><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;">Thanks you for your comments on the document presented from ALAC, you have raised valid points, for the sake of moving forward i would like to inform that ALAC withdraws submitted draft charter document.</span></div><div><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;"><br></span></div><div><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;">The ALAC community submit its comments on issues or updates to the current draft charter text before the end of comments period.</span></div><div><div style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; text-align: left; direction: ltr;"><div style="text-align: left;direction: ltr; "><br></div><div style="text-align: left;direction: ltr; ">Kind Regards,</div><div style="text-align: left;direction: ltr; ">Mohamed</div></div></div><div style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;"><br>On 9 Aug 2014, at 01:20, Jari Arkko <<a href="mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net">jari.arkko@piuha.net</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;"><div><span>Mohamed,</span><br><span></span><br><span>(My personal opinion only.)</span><br><span></span><br><span>Thank you for the feedback and ALAC’s close attention on this topic. It is very important.</span><br><span></span><br><span>However, I agree with what Milton had said about this. I’ll also observe that the text that we had developed in July included many aspects that were important to the different stakeholders. Accountability for Milton, me and others. Independence of the communities and explicitly saying the ICG will not develop proposals was important for many of us in the IETF and RIR communities. And so on. It is difficult to produce a large rewrite of the charter without losing some of these aspects. And I think the new text loses some of these now.</span><br><span></span><br><span>May I propose that a constructive way forward would be for all of us to highlight “major objections” as the announcement page says. In other words, could you give us an issue to look at, rather than the solution (ready-made text) that you think solves that issue?</span><br><span></span><br><span>Jari</span><br><span></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>