<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear ALL,</div><div>In a transparent, inclussive and democratic process ,we need to to at leastconsider and take into account various views</div><div>From the BEGINING, the process was self nomionation and accalamation by few Inside the current ICANN colleagues.</div>
<div>We should not only listen and talk to ourselves rather should listen and talk with others .</div><div>I do not understand what was wrong in my last proposal " PACKAGE dEAL "<br>We are criticising some people without any fair logic</div>
<div>Tks on this nice sunday</div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-08-10 20:26 GMT+02:00 Daniel Karrenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net" target="_blank">daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On 10.08.14 19:57 , James M. Bladel wrote:<br>
> ICG Colleagues:<br>
><br>
> Forgive me for being blunt, but why are we still discussing this?<br>
><br>
<br>
</div><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_law_of_triviality" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_law_of_triviality</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>