<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Martin:<br>
<br>
I think its a safety valve related to when there is a disagreement
as to the sense of the room and direction of consensus. It is also
should not be considered a right to call a poll, but rather to
request for a poll to be called... Perhaps further caveats around
the language would help.<br>
<br>
Finally I am also OK with withdrawing the proposed edit related to
linguistic or cultural expression and potential misunderstanding as
my reservation was only as to form (what would be the best location
for the comment) not substance. <br>
<br>
Joe<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/1/2014 8:47 AM, Martin Boyle
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:4ED5D5CBDF5F3E499DB990B095F010FE8186ACF2@wds-exc1.okna.nominet.org.uk"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered
medium)">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I agree with Joe that we probably
need to have a clean draft to work on – it is getting hard
to read.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>For Joe’s comments I’m ok with all
<b>except</b> the comment (j13) that “Members should also be
able to request the officers to conduct a poll.” That seems
to open for anyone to jump a vote without allowing
“adversaries” to find a happy compromise. I think it could
be a barrier to getting to real consensus. Polls should be
the exception and their use justified. As I’ve said before,
I do not like voting in this framework: while I recognise
it might be a necessary evil, it does undermine the
consensus-development process.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Cheers</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Martin</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
lang="EN-US"> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org">internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org">mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of
</b>joseph alhadeff<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 31 August 2014 12:28<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:internal-cg@icann.org">internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Internal-cg] RFP - publishable
draft?</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p>I have added some proposed edits and comments. I agree that
we have too many terms<span>
</span>that have too flexible an interpretation. I also think
the document is lost in the comments. Can we move a next
draft forward that tries to incorporate some of these comments
and allows us to better consider flow and duplication?</p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>On 8/31/2014 4:52 AM, Kavouss
Arasteh wrote:</span></p>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Dear All,</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Now that we have reconciled on
RFP as announced by Alissa to have been finalized
</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I want to come back to come back to
Consensus Building.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I the meantime I have amended the
proposals that I made based on some comments and
attached here for your kind consideration as ka v3
</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Regards</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">KAVOUSS </p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2014-08-30 23:10 GMT+02:00 Martin
Boyle <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk"
target="_blank">Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk</a>>:</p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Alissa,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks for this: I can’t say any
of these changes really make much difference to the
text as far as I am concerned so, although I still
would prefer the original wording I’m ok to accept
them all. I’d note that on page 2 the first
sentence in the first paragraph under I does not
read right to me: should it read “…and that all
interested parties *<b>should</b>* get involved…”?
But please do not hold this up this draft any
further on my account.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">On your “separate point,” I would
agree that there needs to be a certain time lapse
between drafts to allow for all comments to come
in. Two days can actually mean only a day and a
half with time-zones and accidents on time of
posting. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I’d go back to a point that
NZ-Keith made about decisions on conference calls
and re-think it for discussion drafts – that there
should be time for proposals and counter-proposals
on any draft, followed by a complete clean copy
incorporating any amendments from the discussion.
The important stage is how long a clean draft is on
the table without any further comments before it is
adopted: could we make it 3 days for this phase
(unless all protagonists in the discussion have
agreed with the suggested compromise), which allows
for peoples’ absences or travel schedules?
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">But more important is, let’s try
not to rush from one draft to another unless there
is a good reason (like the page is getting too
cluttered to read)?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">And let us all also remember that
we all have our own views and that these will often
be at odds: when we propose a change, there should
be a decent time for others to consider this idea
and to formulate a response. I have been in the
position where I have been drafting a commentary on
one draft when the next has dropped into the box:
very frustrating! But also, this is not very
conducive to coherent discussion.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Martin</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
lang="EN-US">
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org"
target="_blank">internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>
[mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org"
target="_blank">internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Alissa Cooper<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 30 August 2014 19:13<br>
<b>To:</b> Kavouss Arasteh; Coordination Group</span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Internal-cg] RFP -
publishable draft?</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kavouss, all,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Attached and in dropbox are
v14-alc-ka-alc and v14-alc-ka-alc-clean. These
contain the changes suggested by Kavouss and
the “light-handed” compromise suggested by
Milton. As soon as we get the link to the
centralized information portal from Alice
(which we need on page 1 of the RFP), we’ll
get the secretariat to post this version on
the web site and make an announcement.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On a separate note, it
might make sense to spend a little time at the
Sept 6 meeting talking about expectations for
people’s response times to emails, document
reviews, etc. As I have already noted on this
list, in my opinion allowing at least 48 hours
for responses during the week and 72 hours for
responses over a weekend is justified by the
fact that we are all busy people volunteering
our time for this activity. In the case of
this particular document, the edits from
Kavouss arrived in my inbox at 5:30am in my
time zone on Friday, while I was asleep. I
woke up a few hours later, answered some other
emails (since I knew we wouldn’t have the
portal link ready before I got on my flights
to Turkey) and left for the airport to travel
to Istanbul at 9:00am. I spent 24 of the 26
hours since then in transit. If people expect
faster response times, that is something we
should discuss as a group.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Alissa</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 8/30/14, 5:36 AM,
"Kavouss Arasteh" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com"
target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear Alissa,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Please advise whether
or not after several support to my
proposal as contained/ mentioned in rev 2
that I did send you three days ago , v14
is now amended or not</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Regards</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kavouss
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2014-08-30 14:31
GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com"
target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>>:</p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear All,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">My rev 2 doc.
relating to amenfment to v 14 of
Draft RFP has not been taken into
account</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I think it is not
fair withourt examining a proposal to
ignor it</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">kavouss
</p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">----------
Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: <b>Kavouss Arasteh</b> <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com"
target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>><br>
Date: 2014-08-30 14:30 GMT+02:00<br>
Subject: Fwd: [Internal-cg] RFP -
publishable draft?<br>
To: Coordination Group <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org"
target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a>></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear All,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">My rev 2
doc. relating to amenfment to
v 14 of Draft RFP has not been
taken into account</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I think it
is not fair withourt examining
a proposal it should be
ignored</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kavouss
</p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">----------
Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: <b>joseph alhadeff</b>
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com"
target="_blank">joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com</a>><br>
Date: 2014-08-30 11:35
GMT+02:00<br>
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg]
RFP - publishable draft?</p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">To:
Kavouss Arasteh <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com"
target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Off
list:<br>
<br>
I've lost a bit of the
thread...<br>
<br>
Which of your proposed
edits s the one that
hasn't been properly
accounted for?<br>
<br>
Joe</p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On
8/30/2014 3:31 AM,
Kavouss Arasteh
wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">Dear
All,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">Dear
Alissa</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">What
Milton agreed
was on
consensus
building
process and
not on RFP .</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">What
we are talking
here is RFP. I
have made some
changes which
are not of
editorial
nature but
essential.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">There
are
inconsistencies
in the v14 as
I have
indicated.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">I
have sent that
twice and I
request to be
considered
before being
published as
draft .</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">I
am not in the
little group
nevertheless
the amendment
that I have
proposed are
essebntial.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">However,
should every
body agree
that the draft
should be
published I
have no
problem
provided that
everybody
understand
that the
amendments
proposed by me
are still
valid and to
be considered.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">I
have informed
in different
manner
</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">Regards</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">Kavouss
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">2014-08-30
9:29 GMT+02:00
Kavouss
Arasteh <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com"
target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>>:</p>
<div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">Dear
All,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">Dear
Alissa</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">what
Milton agreed
was on
consensus
building
process.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">What
we are talking
here is RFP. I
have made some
changes which
are not of
editorial
nature but
essential.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">There
are
inconsistencies
in the v14 as
I have
indicated.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">I
have sent that
twice and I
request to be
considered
before being
published as
draft .</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">I
am not in the
little group
nevertheless
the amendment
that I have
proposed are
essebntial.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">However,
should every
body agree
that the draft
should be
published I
have no
problem
provided that
everybody
understand
that the
amendments
proposed by me
are still
valid and to
be considered.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">I
have informed
in different
manner
</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">Regards</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">Kavouss
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal">2014-08-30
7:06 GMT+02:00
Paul Wilson
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:pwilson@apnic.net" target="_blank">pwilson@apnic.net</a>>:
</p>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote>
<p
class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p
class="MsoNormal">I
am keen to
publish the
draft, as a
draft, soon
please. It
doesn’t need
to be
perfected
before we do
that.<br>
<br>
For the record
I agree with
Kavouss’
suggestions,
as amended by
Milton, and
happy for
these to be
included<br>
<br>
thanks<br>
<br>
Paul.<br>
<br>
________________________________________________________________________<br>
Paul Wilson,
Director-General,
APNIC
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:dg@apnic.net" target="_blank">dg@apnic.net</a>><br>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.apnic.net" target="_blank">http://www.apnic.net</a>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B61%207%203858%203100" target="_blank">+61 7 3858 3100</a><br>
<br>
See you at
APNIC 38!
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://conference.apnic.net/38" target="_blank">
http://conference.apnic.net/38</a></p>
<div>
<div>
<p
class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 30 Aug
2014, at 4:26
am, Kavouss
Arasteh <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com"
target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
> Milton,<br>
> Thank you
again for yr
analysis<br>
> Yes I
could make a
consensus with
your last
suggestion<br>
> Pls go
ahead and I
thank you for
that.<br>
> By the
way do you
know any ting
about a book
published in
70 s about
that group?<br>
> tks and
have a nice
week-end ,if I
do not hear
from you<br>
> Kavouss<br>
><br>
><br>
>
2014-08-29
20:12
GMT+02:00
Mohamed El
Bashir <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:mbashir@mbash.net" target="_blank">mbashir@mbash.net</a>>:<br>
> After
reviewing
Kavouss RFP
updates, I
prefer to keep
the text "
light
coordination
role" and I am
fine with the
rest of the
updates .<br>
><br>
> We
suppose to
finished and
published the
RFP yesterday,
I propose move
ahead and
publish the
latest version
as agreed
before the
IGF.<br>
><br>
> Kind
Regards,<br>
> Mohamed<br>
><br>
> On 29 Aug
2014, at
19:47, Kavouss
Arasteh <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com"
target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Dear
Manal<br>
>> ,<br>
>> I am
not pointing
toward any one
who made the
suggestion
that the
adjective "
Light " being
added to the
word or term "
Coordination "<br>
>> I am
just saysing
that ICG tasks
. interalia,
is to
coordinate the
activities .<br>
>> This
does not any
thing to do
with TOP down
or button up
process .Just
it does not
feet. It give
the impression
that the
activities of
ICCG on this
matter is a
light
activitiwes
and not a
complete and
in-depth<br>
>> Tks<br>
>>
Kavouss<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>
2014-08-29
19:10
GMT+02:00
Manal Ismail
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg" target="_blank">manal@tra.gov.eg</a>>:<br>
>> This
was not the
intention of
course .. I
have inserted
this clause
“in order to
help ICG
maintain its
light
coordination
role” as I
thought 2
things would
make it more
convincing for
non-operational
parties to
work through
the
operational
communities
processes:<br>
>><br>
>> -
to make
sure the ICG
does not have
a top-down
decision-making
authority, and<br>
>><br>
>> -
to make
sure their
contributions
are considered
early within
the process,
and directly
discussed with
the relevant
party<br>
>><br>
>> Just
thought to
clarify, but
I’m flexible
should
colleagues
feel it does
not serve the
purpose of the
first bullet
..<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Kind
Regards<br>
>><br>
>>
--Manal<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> From:
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>
[mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
On Behalf Of
Kavouss
Arasteh<br>
>> Sent:
Friday, August
29, 2014 6:45
PM<br>
>> To:
Milton L
Mueller<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Cc:
Coordination
Group<br>
>>
Subject: Re:
[Internal-cg]
RFP -
publishable
draft?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Dear
Milton,<br>
>><br>
>> Thank
you very much
for your kind
response .You
are among the
most
knowledgeable
and competent
as far as I
understand the
exchange of
message.<br>
>><br>
>> Pls
kindly note
that the term
LIGHT before
coordination,
weakenes our
actions .It
could be
interpreted
that the
coordination
actions that
we undertake
is not
sufficiently
serious as it
is qualified
by the
adjective
LIGHT.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Would
it cause any
difficulty
that we delete
that and just
refer to
coordination
without any
qualification.<br>
>><br>
>>
Regards<br>
>><br>
>>
Kavouss<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>
2014-08-29
15:54
GMT+02:00
Milton L
Mueller <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:mueller@syr.edu" target="_blank">mueller@syr.edu</a>>:<br>
>><br>
>> My
opinions
regarding
Kavouss’s
proposed
changes:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Would
prefer to keep
“light” in
there.<br>
>><br>
>> OK to
remove the
word “only”
from the
paragraph on
Comments<br>
>><br>
>> OK to
replace
“direct” with
“forward”<br>
>><br>
>> OK to
replace
“encourages”
with “urges”<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>
Milton L
Mueller<br>
>><br>
>> Laura
J and L.
Douglas
Meredith
Professor<br>
>><br>
>>
Syracuse
University
School of
Information
Studies<br>
>><br>
>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/" target="_blank">http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> From:
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>
[mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
On Behalf Of
Martin Boyle<br>
>> Sent:
Friday, August
29, 2014 8:46
AM<br>
>> To:
Kavouss
Arasteh;
Daniel
Karrenberg<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Cc:
Coordination
Group<br>
>>
Subject: Re:
[Internal-cg]
RFP -
publishable
draft?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>
Thanks Alissa
for your work
on this. I’m
sure we could
continue
word-smithing
this for a
long time, and
I’m happy to
go.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>
Kavouss’s
comment on
light: I like
the term as it
reminds
everyone that
we are not
planning to
play the
autocrats.
But if
non-native
English
speakers find
the meaning
obscure I’m ok
without.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>
Cheers<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>
Martin<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> From:
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>
[mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">internal-cg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
On Behalf Of
Kavouss
Arasteh<br>
>> Sent:
29 August 2014
13:32<br>
>> To:
Daniel
Karrenberg<br>
>> Cc:
Coordination
Group<br>
>>
Subject: Re:
[Internal-cg]
RFP -
publishable
draft?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Dear
Alissa,<br>
>><br>
>> Dear
All,<br>
>><br>
>> I
suggest some
small
amendments to
make various
parts of the
text
consistent
with each
other<br>
>><br>
>> See
attachment<br>
>><br>
>>
Kavouss the l<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>
2014-08-29
13:37
GMT+02:00
Daniel
Karrenberg
<<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net" target="_blank">daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net</a>>:<br>
>><br>
>> On
28.08.14 23:36
, Alissa
Cooper wrote:<br>
>> >
...<br>
>><br>
>> ><br>
>> >
Are there any
objections to
publishing
this as a
draft (and
having the<br>
>> >
secretariat
host it on our
web site and
make an
announcement
about its<br>
>> >
existence) by
Sept 1?<br>
>><br>
>> I
support
publishing
this as a daft
with Elise's
corrections.<br>
>><br>
>>
Daniel<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>
Internal-cg
mailing list<br>
>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>
Internal-cg
mailing list<br>
>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
><br>
>
_______________________________________________<br>
>
Internal-cg
mailing list<br>
> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
><br>
><br>
>
_______________________________________________<br>
>
Internal-cg
mailing list<br>
> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg
mailing list<br>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p
class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<p
class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<pre>_______________________________________________</pre>
<pre>Internal-cg mailing list</pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org"
target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg"
target="_blank">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a> </p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
<pre>_______________________________________________</pre>
<pre>Internal-cg mailing list</pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org">Internal-cg@icann.org</a></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>