<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear All,</div><div>Thank you very much for V5 Draft</div><div>Still many of my suggestions were not taken into account</div><div>e.g. </div><div>ICG is expected ... where as I clearly mentioned that we should not talk about or refer to expectation rather talk about or refer to what should be done either mandatory " shall " or morally mandatory " should " or between the two " needs to " </div>
<div>Quorums</div><div>What is the criteria used ," at least one member from each communities" what are these communities quantitatively </div><div>We should always talk about number ( s) I suggested at least 2/3 or 4/5 BUT CERTAINLY NOT 1/2since it is totally in appropriate that for such a delicate ,sensitive issue 14 out of 30 disagree and still we take the decision is valid.</div>
<div>Please look at all international law decision making process 2/3 is the minimum</div><div><br></div><div>There are other examples that my points were not taken into account</div><div>Please kindly reconsider the matter and carefully examine them and proceed</div>
<div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-09-02 0:19 GMT+02:00 WUKnoben <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de" target="_blank">wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt">
<div>All,</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt"> </div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt">attached is
draft version v5 of the consensus building document which I’ve also uploaded to
the dropbox.</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt"> </div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt">In addition
I send you the “ICG-Consensus Building_draft_v4 + MB (1),KA V3JHA” with all
latest revisions and comments from your side (I hope I’m right). I have inserted
my comments to yours as well as proposals on how to proceed. ICG-Consensus
Building_draft_v5 is the result of this exercise:</div>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt">it is
explained that ICANN Board Liaison and <span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">ICANN Staff
Laison Expert are not taking part in the decision making</font></span></div>
<li>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">“participants” replaced by
“members”</font></span></div>
<li>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">quorum for decision making is defined as: A quorum is a
majority of ICG members and must include at least one member of each ICG
community (</font><a><font color="#0000ff" face="Times New Roman">https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/coordination-group-2014-06-17-en</font></a><font face="Times New Roman">; 16 or more). This would cover Martins respective
comment. If required something could be included in case of unintended
absence.</font></span></div>
<li>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">re 4.a Personnel Decisions: in the second para. I
suggest to lift the voting threshold to the level of the quorum as defined.
Otherwise a voting with 9 affirmative votes may succeed which seems to be
unbalanced.</font></span></div>
<li>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">“small minority”: should further be discussed. I added
the condition that a recommendation is not reached if at least one of the ICG
communities (according to the list) as a whole is firmly and formally opposed.
That would mean a formal written objection by the community leadership on
behalf of their community.</font></span></div>
<li>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">minority views – if any – should be expressed in the
report (maybe as an annex)</font></span></div>
<li>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">chair / (and/or) vicechairs: I think the respective
roles, proxies etc. should be added to the “chair responsibility” document.
Then here in the consensus building document reference is only made to the
chair.</font></span></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman"></font></span> </p>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri";font-size:12pt">Please
provide your comments with the “comment” function in order to make it easier
to manage.<br><br>Best
regards<br><br>Wolf-Ulrich<br><br></div></li></li></li></li></li></li></li></ul></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>