<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Friend</div><div>I do not know what is in version 5</div><div>Pls look at the attached doc.</div><div>KAVOUSS </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-09-03 12:23 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alissa@cooperw.in" target="_blank">alissa@cooperw.in</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><div><div>On 9/3/14, 1:10 PM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<span><div><br></div><blockquote><div dir="ltr"><div>I do not know what we are dealing here</div></div></blockquote></span><div><br></div></div><div>I was commenting on v5 circulated by Wolf-Ulrich. That version has text in it that I find problematic, as indicated in my email. The v4 version you circulated does not contain that language. As I will not be present on Sept 6, I’m trying to get my comments to the mailing list in advance of the meeting.</div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Alissa</div></font></span><div><div class="h5"><div><br></div><span><blockquote><div dir="ltr"><div>Please kindly read my doc on consensus building sent to you last night </div>
<div>Vrsion 4 </div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
2014-09-03 10:28 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alissa@cooperw.in" target="_blank">alissa@cooperw.in</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
Wolf-Ulrich,<br><br>
Thanks for your work on this.<br><br>
On 9/2/14, 1:19 AM, "WUKnoben" <<a href="mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de" target="_blank">wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>* “small minority”: should further be discussed. I added<br><div>> the condition that a recommendation is not reached if at least one of<br>
>the ICG<br>
> communities (according to the list) as a whole is firmly and formally<br>
>opposed.<br>
> That would mean a formal written objection by the community leadership<br>
>on<br>
> behalf of their community.<br>
><br><br></div>I’m not sure this matches what was being discussed on the list. If we use<br>
the text Martin had suggested, I think the third bullet under section 4(b)<br>
should read:<br><br>
"After enough time has passed for the ICG to consider and attempt to<br>
accommodate objections, the ICG can reach a conclusion if at most a small<br>
minority disagrees and their objections have been documented. It is not<br>
expected that the representatives of an operational community<br>
significantly and directly affected by a conclusion would be overruled in<br>
this process.”<br><span><font color="#888888"><br>
Alissa<br></font></span><div><div><br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></blockquote></span></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>