<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Kavouss,</div><div><br></div><div>I am happy that we agree how to handle this. Accordingly, let us drop the whole subject until ICG hears substantive input on the timeline. <br><br>Daniel<br><div><br></div>---<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.231373); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.231373); ">Sent from a handheld device.</span><br></div></div><div><br>On 03.10.2014, at 19:35, Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Daniel</div><div>You misunderstoofd me,</div><div>I did not propose to discuss changing the deadline.</div><div>I simply proposed to discuss the message7letter received from Jonathan and Byron .</div><div>You have noted that I proposed to advise them to make evry effort such as arranging virtual meeting/ conference calls to resolve problems and avoid the need to delay the reply</div><div>Please read my message.</div><div>Nothuiing wrong to discuss the message sent to Alissa to find out whether other measures ,aparat from increased number of conference calls7 virtual meetings, could be suggested</div><div><br></div><div>I hope I am now more clearer and confirm /agree with your view point as I have explored </div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-10-03 16:40 GMT+02:00 Daniel Karrenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net" target="_blank">daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Oops! The second part of this message was intended to go to Kavouss only. I did not intend to make a point of it.<br>
<span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
D<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Sent from a handheld device.<br>
<br>
</span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> On 03.10.2014, at 16:27, Daniel Karrenberg <<a href="mailto:daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net">daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Kavouss, colleagues,<br>
><br>
> We have agreed and published a time line. We would be ill advised to formally discuss revising it before we even have formally heared significant and concrete reasons to revise it and had time to consider them. I have not yet heared any. Therefore I do not support any formal discussion about changing the time line at this point and I caution against a formal discussion of this topic during our upcoming LA meeting.<br>
><br>
> Daniel<br>
><br>
> Note well that personally I have spoken against this time line before we agreed it. Consult the minutes of our first f2f meeting for my reasons.<br>
><br>
> Daniel<br>
> ---<br>
> Sent from a handheld device.<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>