<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19510"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19537">Thank you Samantha for the prompt action.</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19658" dir="ltr"><br><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19537"></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19659" dir="ltr"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19537">It is seems No 1 action item needs re-couching, my understanding was that we have a level of comfort from the statements/briefing by Kuo Wu as the ICANN Board liaison to ICG. <br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_20519" dir="ltr"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19537"><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_20520" dir="ltr"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19537">Did we agree to demand a written undertaking from the ICANN Board in addition to Wu's statements?</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_20521" dir="ltr"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19537"> <br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_20175" dir="ltr"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19537">May be I missed the point, please correct me, if I got it wrong. </span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_20002" dir="ltr"><br><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19537"></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_20524" dir="ltr"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1416970984886_19537">Mary Uduma</span></div> <div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></div><div style="display: block;" class="yahoo_quoted"> <div style="font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 4:07 AM, Samantha Dickinson <samantha@linguasynaptica.com> wrote:<br> </font> </div> <br><br> <div class="y_msg_container">Action items from today's call:<br><br>1. Wu to ask ICANN Board to send a formal written communication<br>confirming that the Board plans to participate early in the proposal<br>develop process and not leave the raising of any new issues to the<br>proposal submission process of 17-31 July 2015.<br><br>2. Cooper to edit Step 4 of the latest version of the proposal<br>finalization document (proposal-finalization-v3-pw-lsa.docx), to<br>remove the more specific text in part b), on how the proposal is<br>transmitted, and update part c) to not be so specific about how and<br>when the ICANN Board is to give feedback on the proposal.<br><br>3. ICG to consider flagging issue of contracting and “separability “of<br>IANA functions (under discussion by CWG on names component of IANA<br>stewardship transition) with leaders of all communities developing<br>stewardship proposals.<br><br><br>Regards,<br>Sam<br>_______________________________________________<br>Internal-cg mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div> </div></body></html>