<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>I’ve reviewed this thread and the other related threads and would like to suggest the following:</div><div><br></div><div><div>We should strive to get a few people specifically committed to reviewing each proposal, and those people should have varying levels of involvement in each process and familiarity with each community, including “insiders” and “outsiders.” For protocol parameters, I would suggest that the full reviewers be:</div><div><br></div><div>Jean-Jacques Subrenat</div><div>Keith Drazek</div><div>Daniel Karrenberg</div><div>Jari Arkko</div><div><br></div><div>This group has a couple of “outsiders,” Jari who was deeply involved in the proposal development, and Daniel who is familiar with the IETF but was not involved in the proposal development. Based on who else has volunteered already, I think we can find this kind of balance for all of the proposals we receive.</div><div><br></div><div>(Jean-Jacques and Keith have already volunteered for protocol parameters — would be great if the other two listed above are available for this but if not please shout). </div><div><br></div><div>Anyone else who wants to review the proposal should feel free to do so, of course.</div><div><br></div><div>Joe and I have put together the attached assessment sheet for the reviewers to fill out and send back to the ICG when their reviews are complete. <<a href="https://www.dropbox.com/home/CoordinationGroup/Proposal finalization process">https://www.dropbox.com/home/CoordinationGroup/Proposal%20finalization%20process</a>></div><div><br></div><div>Since we have a call scheduled for January 28, I would suggest a deadline of January 26 for the protocol parameters reviewers to send their reviews to the ICG, and for anyone else to send reviews or initial comments. Then we could potentially have some initial discussion and Q&A on our January 28 call, to be continued Feb 6-7. This timing gives the reviewers 2 weeks to complete their reviews.</div><div><br></div><div>Does this seem workable?</div><div><br></div><div>Alissa</div><div><br></div><div></div></div></body></html>