<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421227830992_368930">Thank you Alissa. <br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421227830992_369519">I have no objections to your suggestions and your formulation is good to go. <br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421227830992_369821" dir="ltr">However, what would be the impact on our established timelines if the CWG asks for additional 4 weeks? <br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421227830992_370359" dir="ltr">I participated in the parallel subgroup 3 of the CWG IANA call today, it looks like the group would refresh the process. <br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421227830992_374880" dir="ltr">I am thinking, perhaps, the ICG may consider continuing with assessment of other communities' submissions (Protocol Parameters and Numbers) in line with the agreed finalization process, while waiting for the Names to complete its proposal. <br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421227830992_375924" dir="ltr">The Chair may have to make a public statement regarding the development.<br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421227830992_373386" dir="ltr"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421227830992_368954" dir="ltr">Mary Uduma<br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421227830992_368932" dir="ltr"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421227830992_368727"><span></span></div> <div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></div><div style="display: block;" class="yahoo_quoted"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font size="2" face="Arial"> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 11:39 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:<br> </font> </div> <br><br> <div class="y_msg_container">Wolf-Ulrich suggested on the call today that we send a note to the CWG to obtain more information about their expected timeline if it does indeed slip. I’m happy to send such a note if people agree. I’ve drafted something up below.<br><br>What do others think? Should we send a note? What do you think of the text below?<br><br>Alissa<br><br>----<br><br>Dear CWG,<br><br>The ICG has been following the developments in all of the operational communities, including the naming community. We have noted some discussions about the possibility that the CWG might require additional time to complete its response to the ICG RFP beyond its original planned submission date of January 30, 2015. We would ask that if you decide to revise your estimated completion date that you share with the ICG your revised expected timeline.<br><br>Thank you,<br>Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG<br>_______________________________________________<br>Internal-cg mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org" href="mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org">Internal-cg@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg</a><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div> </div></body></html>